Back to Search Start Over

Radial Versus Femoral Access for the Treatment of Left Main Lesion in the Era of Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents

Authors :
Sebastiano Gili
Hiroyoshi Kawamoto
Marco Pavani
Pierluigi Omedè
Claudio Moretti
Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai
Antonio Colombo
Maurizio D'Amico
Fabrizio D'Ascenzo
Roberto di Summa
Alaide Chieffo
Fabrizio Ugo
Fiorenzo Gaita
Ferdinando Varbella
Giacomo Boccuzzi
Francesco Tomassini
Antonio Montefusco
Federico Conrotto
Roberto Garbo
Javier Escaned
Enrico Cerrato
Gili, Sebastiano
D'Ascenzo, Fabrizio
Di Summa, Roberto
Conrotto, Federico
Cerrato, Enrico
Chieffo, Alaide
Boccuzzi, Giacomo
Montefusco, Antonio
Ugo, Fabrizio
Omedã©, Pierluigi
Kawamoto, Hiroyoshi
Tomassini, Francesco
Pavani, Marco
Varbella, Ferdinando
Garbo, Roberto
D'Amico, Maurizio
Biondi Zoccai, Giuseppe
Moretti, Claudio
Escaned, Javier
Colombo, Antonio
Gaita, Fiorenzo
Source :
The American Journal of Cardiology. 120:33-39
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2017.

Abstract

Transradial access (TRA) is often avoided in favor of the transfemoral access (TFA) during percutaneous coronary interventions of the unprotected left main coronary artery (ULM), due to technical and safety concerns. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of TRA and TFA in the treatment of ULM with second-generation drug-eluting stents. Consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention on ULM with second-generation drug-eluting stents were retrospectively enrolled in the multicenter Failure in Left Main Study With 2nd Generation Stents (FAILS 2) registry. Patients were stratified according to the arterial access. The choice between TRA and TFA was left to each operator's preferences. Bleedings during index hospitalization were the primary end point. Secondary end points were major adverse cardiovascular events (a composite of death, reinfarction, and target lesion revascularization), the single components of major adverse cardiovascular events at follow-up and stent thrombosis. Propensity score matching was executed to account for possible confounding. Overall, 1,247 patients were enrolled (23.2% [289] of female gender, mean age 70.2 ± 10.2 years). Diagnosis at presentation was stable angina in 603 (48.7%) cases, non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome in 465 (37.3%), ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in 117 (9.5%). Mean follow-up was 726 ± 654 days. After propensity score with matching, 354 patients were included. The primary end point was significantly reduced in patients treated with TRA (2.0% vs 4.0%, p = 0.042), whereas no differences emerged pertaining the secondary end points, including target lesion revascularization and reinfarction. In conclusion, TRA may reduce in-hospital bleedings in patients undergoing percutaneous treatment of the ULM, without increasing the rate of adverse cardiovascular events at follow-up, and may therefore be safely used in the treatment of the ULM.

Details

ISSN :
00029149
Volume :
120
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The American Journal of Cardiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e71068d6c606d56114ba4b07f52b6793
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.03.262