Back to Search Start Over

Effectiveness of common antidepressants: a post market release study

Authors :
Melanie Yousefi
Hua Min
Laura K Becker
Christopher A. Hane
Vijay S. Nori
Farrokh Alemi
Janusz Wojtusiak
Source :
EClinicalMedicine
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background This study summarizes the experiences of patients, who have multiple comorbidities, with 15 mono-treated antidepressants. Methods This is a retrospective, observational, matched case control study. The cohort was organized using claims data available through OptumLabs for depressed patients treated with antidepressants between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2018. The cohort included patients from all states within United States of America. The analysis focused on 3,678,082 patients with major depression who had 10,221,145 antidepressant treatments. Using the robust, and large predictors of remission, and propensity to prescribe an antidepressant, the study created 16,770 subgroups of patients. The study reports the remission rate for the antidepressants within the subgroups. The overall impact of antidepressant on remission was calculated as the common odds ratio across the strata. Findings The study accurately modelled clinicians’ prescription patterns (cross-validated Area under the Receiver Operating Curve, AROC, of 82.0%, varied from 77% to 90%) and patients’ remission (cross-validated AROC of 72.0%, varied from 69.5% to 78%). In different strata, contrary to published randomized studies, remission rates differed significantly and antidepressants were not equally effective. For example, in age and gender subgroups, the best antidepressant had an average remission rate of 50.78%, 1.5 times higher than the average antidepressant (30.30% remission rate) and 20 times higher than the worst antidepressant. The Breslow-Day chi-square test for homogeneity showed that across strata a homogenous common odds-ratio did not exist (alpha

Details

ISSN :
25895370
Volume :
41
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
EClinicalMedicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e67e8d462137c68db5375edf364d8770