Back to Search Start Over

Point-of-Use Mixing of Influenza H5N1 Vaccine and MF59 Adjuvant for Pandemic Vaccination Preparedness: Antibody Responses and Safety. A Phase 1 Clinical Trial

Authors :
Suzanne Murray
Lawanda Parker
Ellen Destefano
Heather Hill
Nadine Rouphael
Patricia L. Winokur
Mark J. Mulligan
Richard Gorman
Paul Spearman
Claire Stablein
Jenifer Whitaker
Shy Shorer
Geraldine Dull
Lilin Lai
Logan Haller
Bridgette Myers
Theda Gajadhar
Dongli Wang
Sharon E. Frey
Amy Cline
Brenda Leung
Valerie R. Johnson
Amanda F Strudwick
Kathy Stephens
Mark Wolff
Bernadette Jolles
Edwin L. Anderson
Brooke Hartwell
Candi Looney
Allison Beck
Irene Graham
Eileen Osinski
Nancy Wagner
Jeffery Scoggins
Melinda Ogilvie
Shixiong Li
Thomas Pacatte
Wendy Buchanan
Brian Mangal
Ling Yue
Nayoka Rimann
Barbara Taggart
Rachel May
Linda Lambert
Diana L. Noah
Sonnie Kim
William Emery
Donna Bowen
Karen Pierce
Srilatha Edupuganti
Michelle Dickey
David I. Bernstein
Carl Ying
Megan May
Soju Chang
Tara Foltz
Nertaissa Cochran
Michelle Bell
Angela Burns
Source :
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Publication Year :
2014
Publisher :
Oxford University Press, 2014.

Abstract

The enduring pandemic threat of Avian influenza A/H5N1 was underscored in January 2014 when the first North American H5N1 death was documented in a Canadian who returned from China [1, 2]. For almost 2 decades preceding this fatality, the pandemic potential of avian H5N1 influenza has been of concern [3, 4]. More than 30 sporadic cases of H5N1 infection occurred in 2013, for a total of 648 laboratory-confirmed illnesses, and ∼60% mortality was reported to the World Health Organization by 16 countries from 2003 to 2013 [5]. The repeated outbreaks of novel and variant avian and swine influenza viruses in humans have led to efforts to produce vaccines against these pandemic or potential pandemic viruses. Clinical trials of candidate H5N1 vaccines revealed that these hemagglutinins (HAs) were poor vaccine antigens [6–8], but antibody responses could be improved substantially with adjuvants [9]. Because vaccine supplies may be limited, it is also important to lower the antigen dose required to induce protection in order to make limited vaccine supplies available for protection of more people. For stockpiled vaccine antigens that require an adjuvant to achieve protective antibody titers, 1 rapid response approach would be to match the relevant antigen to a stockpiled adjuvant at pandemic onset and mix the reagents at designated field sites—the mix-and-match approach tested here. The squalene-containing oil-in-water emulsion adjuvant, MF59, improved the antibody response, permitted dose sparing, and enhanced efficacy [10] when paired with inactivated influenza vaccines [11–14]. MF59-adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccines were first licensed for the elderly [15] by the European Union in 1997 and—along with MF59-adjuvanted 2009 H1N1 pandemic vaccines—have subsequently been licensed in more than 30 countries with an excellent safety profile and over 65 million doses delivered [16]. MF59-adjuvanted vaccines have not been licensed in the United States. However, the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) has procured in the National Pre-pandemic Influenza Vaccine Stockpile both H5N1 vaccines and the oil-in-water adjuvants MF59 and AS03. Here, we studied a mix-and-match tactic that paired a stockpiled H5N1 antigen from one manufacturer with stockpiled MF59 adjuvant from another manufacturer, and we demonstrated the potential of point-of-use mixing as a flexile logistical tactic for rapid deployment of stockpiled vaccine reagents should an H5N1 pandemic occur.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
23288957
Volume :
1
Issue :
3
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e66d0186663eb563132539d33c26c16f