Back to Search Start Over

Safety and Performance of Etermis 3 and 4 in Wrinkles/Folds Treatment and Facial Volume Enhancement: A Prospective, Evaluator-Blinded, Open-Label Study

Authors :
Martina Kerscher
Hanna Dersch
Welf Prager
Patricia Ogilvie
Gemma Odena
Gerhard Sattler
Tanja C. Fischer
Ernst Magnus Noah
Matthias Hofmann
Source :
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Informa UK Limited, 2020.

Abstract

Gerhard Sattler,1 Martina Kerscher,2 Ernst Magnus Noah,3 Welf Prager,4 Tanja C Fischer,5 Patricia Ogilvie,6 Matthias Hofmann,7 Hanna Dersch,7 Gemma Odena8 1Rosenparkklinik GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany; 2Division of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Cosmetic Science, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; 3Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hand Surgery, Kassel, Germany; 4Prager & Partner Dermatologische Praxis, Hamburg, Germany; 5Haut- Und Lasercentrum Berlin-Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany; 6SkinConcept, Munich, Germany; 7Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany; 8Merz North America, Inc., Raleigh, NC, USACorrespondence: Gerhard Sattler Email gerhard.sattler@rosenparkklinik.deBackground: Facial aging is characterized by increased prominence of nasolabial folds (NLFs), marionette lines, and thinning of the lips. Cross-linked hyaluronic acid injection is a very effective method for the temporary correction of these areas.Objective: To confirm the clinical performance and the safety of Etermis 3 (ET3) and/or Etermis 4 (ET4) in the treatment of moderate and severe wrinkles/folds, as well as lip volume enhancement.Methods: Subjects were treated in at least two facial areas (NLFs, marionette lines, lips). ET3 was used in facial moderate wrinkles while ET4 was used in severe facial skin volume loss. An optional touch-up 1 month after treatment was possible. A blinded investigator assessed improvement on Merz Aesthetic Scales (MAS). Subjects were followed-up for 12 months after the last treatment.Results: In total, 154 healthy subjects were enrolled. The proportion of subjects achieving ≥ 1 score improvement in MAS after treatment was above 60% for ET4 (Month 6/7: NLFs 94.9% and marionette lines 81.4%, p≤ 0.0004; Month 3/4: lips 63.0%, p=0.39) and ET3 (Month 6/7: marionette lines 79.4%, p=0.0005; Month 3/4: lips 65.5%, p=0.31). Facial improvement was still visible at Month 12/13 for ET4 (NLFs ≥ 76.6%, marionette lines ≥ 61%, lips ≥ 36%) and ET3 (marionette lines ≥ 50% and lips ≥ 21.9%). No treatment-related serious AEs occurred. The most frequent AEs were injection-site reactions.Conclusion: Etermis 3 and Etermis 4 demonstrated good clinical performance and safety for NLFs and marionette lines volume enhancement for up to 12 months. Both products can also be used safely to treat lips for volume augmentation.Keywords: hyaluronic acid, wrinkles, facial volume enhancement

Details

ISSN :
11787015
Volume :
13
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e66598b353112e1c9d91d23349ef9ae7
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2147/ccid.s244598