Back to Search Start Over

Soil filtration‐sedimentation improves shelled protist recovery in eukaryotic <scp>eDNA</scp> surveys

Authors :
Guillaume Lentendu
Estelle P. Bruni
Claudine Ah‐Peng
Junichi Fujinuma
Yasuhiro Kubota
Juan Lorite
Julio Peñas
Shuyin Huang
Dominique Strasberg
Pascal Vittoz
Edward A. D. Mitchell
Laboratory of Soil Biodiversity
Université de Neuchâtel (UNINE)
Peuplements végétaux et bioagresseurs en milieu tropical (UMR PVBMT)
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université de La Réunion (UR)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)
University of Tartu
University of the Ryukyus [Okinawa]
Universidad de Granada = University of Granada (UGR)
Université de Lausanne = University of Lausanne (UNIL)
Source :
Molecular Ecology Resources, Molecular Ecology Resources, 2023, ⟨10.1111/1755-0998.13808⟩
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
Wiley, 2023.

Abstract

International audience; A large part of the soil protist diversity is missed in metabarcoding studies based on 0.25 g of soil environmental DNA (eDNA) and universal primers due to ca. 80% co-amplification of non-target plants, animals and fungi. To overcome this problem, enrichment of the substrate used for eDNA extraction is an easily implemented option but its effect has not yet been tested. In this study, we evaluated the effect of a 150 μm mesh size filtration and sedimentation method to improve the recovery of protist eDNA, while reducing the co-extraction of plant, animal and fungal eDNA, using a set of contrasted forest and alpine soils from La R&#233;union, Japan, Spain and Switzerland. Total eukaryotic diversity was estimated by V4 18S rRNA metabarcoding and classical amplicon sequence variant calling. A 2- to 3- fold enrichment in shelled protists (Euglyphida, Arcellinida and Chrysophyceae) was observed at the sample level with the proposed method, with, at the same time, a 2-fold depletion of Fungi and a 3- fold depletion of Embryophyceae. Protist alpha diversity was slightly lower in filtered samples due to reduced coverage in Variosea and Sarcomonadea, but significant differences were observed in only one region. Beta diversity varied mostly between regions and habitats, which explained the same proportion of variance in bulk soil and filtered samples. The increased resolution in soil protist diversity estimates provided by the filtration-sedimentation method is a strong argument in favour of including it in the standard protocol for soil protist eDNA metabarcoding studies

Details

ISSN :
17550998 and 1755098X
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Molecular Ecology Resources
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e560697bb885217f580a693ac2e02394