Back to Search Start Over

Bortezomib and cyclophosphamide based chemo-mobilization in multiple myeloma

Authors :
Akanksha Chichra
Libin Mathew
Lingaraj Nayak
Papagudi Ganesan Subramanian
Nikhil Patkar
Sumeet Gujral
Sachin Punatar
Prashant Tembhare
Avinash Bonda
Sadhana Kannan
Shashank Ojha
Shashank Das
Navin Khattry
Anant Gokarn
Bhausaheb Bagal
Minal Poojary
Source :
International Journal of Hematology. 112:835-840
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2020.

Abstract

Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) mobilization regimens in multiple myeloma typically use filgrastim (GCSF) alone or combination of GCSF with plerixafor or high-dose cyclophosphamide. Murine model and human studies have shown HSPC mobilization potential of bortezomib. A total of 37 patients underwent mobilization using bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 on day 1, 4, 8 and 11, cyclophosphamide 1 g/m2 on day 8 and 9, and GCSF 10 μg/kg from day 10 (B-Cy-GCSF). This regimen was compared with our earlier cohort of patients where cyclophosphamide was given at dose of 1 g/m2 on day 1 and day 2 followed by GCSF 10 μg/kg from day 4 (Cy-GCSF). In B-Cy-GCSF group, median CD34 cells collected were 9.21 × 106/kg (range 4.95–17.1) while in the Cy-GCSF cohort, the median CD34 cell yield was 8.2 × 106/kg (0.4–24.2). Target CD34 cells yield of 5 × 106/kg was achieved with single apheresis in 58.6% of patients after B-Cy-GCSF mobilization as compared to 44.3% in Cy-GCSF group (p = 0.07). Three patients failed mobilization after Cy-GCSF, while no patients failed mobilization in bortezomib group. Addition of bortezomib to Cy-GCSF mobilization showed a trend towards increased CD34 collection and reduced need for apheresis sessions.

Details

ISSN :
18653774 and 09255710
Volume :
112
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
International Journal of Hematology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e537b073e038bcb5d63b76ccfa7a6acb
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-020-02973-z