Physiology of physical inactivity, sedentary behaviours and non‐exercise activity: insights from the space bedrest model

International audience; Physical inactivity, i.e., not reaching the recommended level of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviors (SB), i.e., sitting time have been associated with increased risk for common metabolic diseases. Recent epidemiological data suggest that high volumes of SB are detrimental for metabolic health, even in the presence of regular exercise, i.e., moderate/vigorous (MVPA). This suggests that the health effects of SB are independent from those of exercise. However, experimentally testing this hypothesis is complicated because of the difficulty in disassociating SB from PA. Bedrest studies, a traditional space science model, can offer new insights. In some bedrest studies, an exercise training protocol has been used to counteract the harmful effects of inactivity. While bedrest induces an inactive and sedentary state, exercise with bedrest represents a unique model of sedentary yet physically active people. Here, we review bedrest studies with and without exercise training. Although exercise training prevents the loss of muscle mass and function, even large volumes of exercise are not sufficient to fully counteract the negative metabolic adaptations triggered by inactivity. This observation supports the existence of independent adverse health effects of SB, but also the potential benefits of non‐exercise activity, i.e., daily living light‐intensity activities (LPA). We gathered available data to examine the complex relationships between exercise, non‐exercise activity, SB and health outcomes. Given the large amount of SB in modern societies, the sole promotion of exercise, i.e., MVPA may be insufficient, and promotion of LPA may be a complimentary approach to improve health.