Back to Search Start Over

Eurados review of retrospective dosimetry techniques for internal exposures to ionising radiation and their applications

Authors :
Natalia V. Sotnik
J Osko
M. A. Lopez
Marina O. Degteva
I. Guclu
Elena A. Shishkina
Alicja Jaworska
Elizabeth A. Ainsbury
Paola Fattibene
Clemens Woda
Stacey L. McComish
I. Malatova
S. Della Monaca
Horst Romm
Augusto Giussani
Sergei Y. Tolmachev
David Lloyd
Laurence Roy
D Melo
George Etherington
Albrecht Wieser
Sandrine Roch-Lefèvre
M. J. Youngman
Antonella Testa
A Rojo
Giussani, A.
Lopez, M. A.
Romm, H.
Testa, A.
Ainsbury, E. A.
Degteva, M.
Della Monaca, S.
Etherington, G.
Fattibene, P.
Guclu, I.
Jaworska, A.
Lloyd, D. C.
Malatova, I.
Mccomish, S.
Melo, D.
Osko, J.
Rojo, A.
Roch-Lefevre, S.
Roy, L.
Shishkina, E.
Sotnik, N.
Tolmachev, S. Y.
Wieser, A.
Woda, C.
Youngman, M.
Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS)
Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas Medioambientales y Tecnológicas [Madrid] (CIEMAT)
Federal Office for Radiation Protection, (BfS)
ENEA Centro Ricerche Casaccia
Public Health England [London]
Urals Research Center for Radiation Medicine
Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS)
CRECE/Radiation Protection Division
Health Protection Agency (HPA)
Turkish Atomic Energy Authority
EPER
Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority (NRPA)
Public Health England
Institute of Biophysycs
State Research Centre of Russia
US Transuranium & Uranium Registries
Melohill Technology
National Centre for Nuclear Research (Warszawa)
Nuclear Regulatory Authority of Argentina
PSE-ENV/SEREN/BERAP
Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN)
PSE-SANTE/SESANE
Southern Urals Biophysics Institute
Helmotz Centrum- München (HZM)
Institute of Radiation Protection
Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU)
Source :
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 59, 357–387 (2020), Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, Springer Verlag, 2020, 59 (3), pp.357-387. ⟨10.1007/s00411-020-00845-y⟩
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

This work presents an overview of the applications of retrospective dosimetry techniques in case of incorporation of radionuclides. The fact that internal exposures are characterized by a spatially inhomogeneous irradiation of the body, which is potentially prolonged over large periods and variable over time, is particularly problematic for biological and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) dosimetry methods when compared with external exposures. The paper gives initially specific information about internal dosimetry methods, the most common cytogenetic techniques used in biological dosimetry and EPR dosimetry applied to tooth enamel. Based on real-case scenarios, dose estimates obtained from bioassay data as well as with biological and/or EPR dosimetry are compared and critically discussed. In most of the scenarios presented, concomitant external exposures were responsible for the greater portion of the received dose. As no assay is available which can discriminate between radiation of different types and different LETs on the basis of the type of damage induced, it is not possible to infer from these studies specific conclusions valid for incorporated radionuclides alone. The biological dosimetry assays and EPR techniques proved to be most applicable in cases when the radionuclides are almost homogeneously distributed in the body. No compelling evidence was obtained in other cases of extremely inhomogeneous distribution. Retrospective dosimetry needs to be optimized and further developed in order to be able to deal with real exposure cases, where a mixture of both external and internal exposures will be encountered most of the times.

Details

ISSN :
14322099 and 0301634X
Volume :
59
Issue :
3
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Radiation and environmental biophysics
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e4788498a2ab8123c3b71929eeb32ab8