Back to Search
Start Over
Evaluation of the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of pimavanserin versus placebo in patients with Alzheimer's disease psychosis: a phase 2, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study
- Source :
- The Lancet Neurology. 17:213-222
- Publication Year :
- 2018
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2018.
-
Abstract
- Pimavanserin is a selective 5-HTWe did a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-centre (with multiple affiliated nursing home sites across the UK) study. We included participants of either sex who were aged 50 years or older with possible or probable Alzheimer's disease and psychotic symptoms including visual or auditory hallucinations, delusions, or both. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to 12 weeks of oral treatment with either pimavanserin (two 17 mg tablets daily) or placebo, with use of permuted block sizes of four and stratified by baseline Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) total score (6 or ≥6) and Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home version (NPI-NH) psychosis score (12 or ≥12). Participants, caregivers, the study sponsor, and study personnel at the clinic site were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was mean change from baseline to week 6 in the NPI-NH psychosis score for pimavanserin versus placebo in the modified intention-to-treat population. Sustained benefit and safety of pimavanserin were assessed through week 12. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02035553.Between Jan 16, 2014, and Oct 27, 2016, 345 participants across 133 nursing homes were screened, of whom 181 were randomly assigned treatment (n=90 pimavanserin and n=91 placebo). 178 participants were included in the modified intention-to-treat population. Mean total baseline NPI-NH psychosis scores were 9·5 (SD 4·8) for the pimavanserin group and 10·0 (5·6) for the placebo group. Mean change in the NPI-NH psychosis score at week 6 was -3·76 points (SE 0·65) for pimavanserin and -1·93 points (0·63) for placebo (mean difference -1·84 [95% CI -3·64 to -0·04], Cohen's d=-0·32; p=0·045). By week 12, no significant advantage for pimavanserin versus placebo was observed for the overall study population (treatment difference -0·51 [95% CI -2·23 to 1·21]; p=0·561). Common adverse events were falls (21 [23%] of 90 participants in the pimavanserin group vs 21 [23%] of 91 in the placebo group), urinary tract infections (20 [22%] vs 25 [28%]), and agitation (19 [21%] vs 13 [14%]). Eight (9%) participants on pimavanserin and 11 (12%) on placebo discontinued treatment because of adverse events. No detrimental effect was observed on cognition or motor function in either group.Pimavanserin showed efficacy in patients with Alzheimer's disease psychosis at the primary endpoint (week 6) with an acceptable tolerability profile and without negative effect on cognition. Further follow-up to week 12 did not show significant advantage for pimavanserin versus placebo.ACADIA Pharmaceuticals.
- Subjects :
- Male
Psychosis
medicine.medical_specialty
Population
Pimavanserin
Placebo
law.invention
03 medical and health sciences
chemistry.chemical_compound
0302 clinical medicine
Double-Blind Method
Piperidines
Randomized controlled trial
Alzheimer Disease
law
Internal medicine
medicine
Clinical endpoint
Humans
Urea
030212 general & internal medicine
education
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
education.field_of_study
business.industry
medicine.disease
Nursing Homes
Clinical trial
Treatment Outcome
Psychotic Disorders
chemistry
Tolerability
Female
Neurology (clinical)
business
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Antipsychotic Agents
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 14744422 and 02035553
- Volume :
- 17
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- The Lancet Neurology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....e45c55f813d56e414a3282861191c4ce
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(18)30039-5