Back to Search Start Over

A New Practical Decision Rule to Better Differentiate BI-RADS 3 or 4 Breast Masses on Breast Ultrasound

Authors :
Chi Ho
Benedikt Schaefgen
Joerg Heil
Michael Golatta
Sarah Fastner
André Pfob
Riku Togawa
Volker Duda
Thomas Bruckner
Christopher Büsch
Richard G. Barr
Juliane Nees
André Hennigs
Christof Sohn
Fabian Riedel
Julia Spratte
Source :
Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in MedicineReferences. 41(2)
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

OBJECTIVES The BI-RADS© classification provides a standardized way to describe ultrasound findings in breast cancer diagnostics. However, there is little information regarding which BI-RADS© descriptors are most strongly associated with malignancy, to better distinguish BI-RADS© 3 (follow-up imaging) and 4 (diagnostic biopsy) breast masses. METHODS Patients were recruited as part of an international, multicenter trial (NCT02638935). The trial enrolled 1294 women (6 excluded) categorized as BI-RADS© 3 or 4 upon routine B-mode ultrasound examination. Ultrasound images were evaluated by three expert physicians according to BI-RADS©. All patients underwent histopathological confirmation (reference standard). We performed univariate and multivariate analyses (chi-square test, logistic regression, and Krippendorff's alpha). RESULTS Histopathologic evaluation showed malignancy in 368 of 1288 masses (28.6%). Upon performing multivariate analysis, the following descriptors were significantly associated with malignancy (P

Details

ISSN :
15509613
Volume :
41
Issue :
2
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in MedicineReferences
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e45236e543cfff77b7c1d352dd34a779