Back to Search Start Over

Improving the Delivery of Chronic Opioid Therapy Among People Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial

Authors :
Christopher W. Shanahan
Jeffrey H. Samet
Kishna Outlaw
Wendy S. Armstrong
Christin Root
Margaret M. Sullivan
Alexander Y. Walley
Marlene C. Lira
Carly Bridden
Carlos del Rio
Catherine E. Harris
Judith I. Tsui
Jonathan Colasanti
Jane M. Liebschutz
Catherine Abrams
Leah S Forman
Debbie M. Cheng
Source :
Clin Infect Dis
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2020.

Abstract

Background Chronic pain is prevalent among people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH); managing pain with chronic opioid therapy (COT) is common. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) providers often diverge from prescribing guidelines. Methods This 2-arm, unblinded, cluster-randomized clinical trial assessed whether the Targeting Effective Analgesia in Clinics for HIV (TEACH) intervention improves guideline-concordant care compared to usual care for PLWH on COT. The trial was implemented from 2015 to 2018 with 12-month follow-up at safety-net hospital–based HIV clinics in Boston and Atlanta. We enrolled 41 providers and their 187 patients on COT. Prescribers were randomized 1:1 to either a 12-month intervention consisting of a nurse care manager with an interactive electronic registry, opioid education, academic detailing, and access to addiction specialists or a control condition consisting of usual care. Two primary outcomes were assessed through electronic medical records: ≥2 urine drug tests and any early COT refills by 12 months. Other outcomes included possible adverse consequences. Results At 12 months, the TEACH intervention arm had higher odds of ≥2 urine drug tests than the usual care arm (71% vs 20%; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 13.38 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 5.85–30.60]; P < .0001). We did not detect a statistically significant difference in early refills (22% vs 30%; AOR, 0.55 [95% CI, .26–1.15]; P = .11), pain severity (6.30 vs 5.76; adjusted mean difference, 0.10 [95% CI, −1.56 to 1.75]; P = .91), or HIV viral load suppression (86.9% vs 82.1%; AOR, 1.21 [95% CI, .47–3.09]; P = .69). Conclusions TEACH is a promising intervention to improve adherence to COT guidelines without evident adverse consequences.

Details

ISSN :
15376591 and 10584838
Volume :
73
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e405edaa25f4a16b84354f54f77ffb68
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1025