Back to Search
Start Over
Fully Automated Segmentation of the Pons and Midbrain Using Human T1 MR Brain Images
- Source :
- PLoS ONE, PLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 1, p e85618 (2014), PloS one (2014). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085618, info:cnr-pdr/source/autori:Nigro S, Cerasa A, Zito G, Perrotta P, Chiaravalloti F, Donzuso G, Fera F, Bilotta E, Pantano P, Quattrone A./titolo:Fully automated segmentation of the pons and midbrain using human T1 MR brain images/doi:10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0085618/rivista:PloS one/anno:2014/pagina_da:/pagina_a:/intervallo_pagine:/volume
- Publication Year :
- 2014
- Publisher :
- Public Library of Science, 2014.
-
Abstract
- Purpose This paper describes a novel method to automatically segment the human brainstem into midbrain and pons, called LABS: Landmark-based Automated Brainstem Segmentation. LABS processes high-resolution structural magnetic resonance images (MRIs) according to a revised landmark-based approach integrated with a thresholding method, without manual interaction. Methods This method was first tested on morphological T1-weighted MRIs of 30 healthy subjects. Its reliability was further confirmed by including neurological patients (with Alzheimer's Disease) from the ADNI repository, in whom the presence of volumetric loss within the brainstem had been previously described. Segmentation accuracies were evaluated against expert-drawn manual delineation. To evaluate the quality of LABS segmentation we used volumetric, spatial overlap and distance-based metrics. Results The comparison between the quantitative measurements provided by LABS against manual segmentations revealed excellent results in healthy controls when considering either the midbrain (DICE measures higher that 0.9; Volume ratio around 1 and Hausdorff distance around 3) or the pons (DICE measures around 0.93; Volume ratio ranging 1.024–1.05 and Hausdorff distance around 2). Similar performances were detected for AD patients considering segmentation of the pons (DICE measures higher that 0.93; Volume ratio ranging from 0.97–0.98 and Hausdorff distance ranging 1.07–1.33), while LABS performed lower for the midbrain (DICE measures ranging 0.86–0.88; Volume ratio around 0.95 and Hausdorff distance ranging 1.71–2.15). Conclusions Our study represents the first attempt to validate a new fully automated method for in vivo segmentation of two anatomically complex brainstem subregions. We retain that our method might represent a useful tool for future applications in clinical practice.
- Subjects :
- Male
Anatomy and Physiology
Computer science
Image Processing
lcsh:Medicine
Corpus callosum
Diagnostic Radiology
Pattern Recognition, Automated
Engineering
Mesencephalon
Pons
Segmentation
Computer vision
lcsh:Science
Multidisciplinary
medicine.diagnostic_test
fMRI
Software Engineering
Brain
Anatomy
Middle Aged
Thresholding
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Fully automated
Medicine
Female
Brainstem
Radiology
Algorithms
Research Article
Adult
ComputingMethodologies_IMAGEPROCESSINGANDCOMPUTERVISION
Neuroimaging
Midbrain
Young Adult
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
medicine
Humans
Biology
Aged
business.industry
Software Tools
lcsh:R
Computational Biology
Reproducibility of Results
Magnetic resonance imaging
Voxel-based morphometry
Computer Science
Signal Processing
lcsh:Q
Programming Languages
Artificial intelligence
business
Neuroscience
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 19326203
- Volume :
- 9
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- PLoS ONE
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....e3ac72fd7bcd81a38148c1122bb84c03