Back to Search Start Over

Fully Automated Segmentation of the Pons and Midbrain Using Human T1 MR Brain Images

Authors :
Salvatore Nigro
Antonio Cerasa
Giancarlo Zito
Paolo Perrotta
Francesco Chiaravalloti
Giulia Donzuso
Franceso Fera
Eleonora Bilotta
Pietro Pantano
Aldo Quattrone
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Source :
PLoS ONE, PLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 1, p e85618 (2014), PloS one (2014). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085618, info:cnr-pdr/source/autori:Nigro S, Cerasa A, Zito G, Perrotta P, Chiaravalloti F, Donzuso G, Fera F, Bilotta E, Pantano P, Quattrone A./titolo:Fully automated segmentation of the pons and midbrain using human T1 MR brain images/doi:10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0085618/rivista:PloS one/anno:2014/pagina_da:/pagina_a:/intervallo_pagine:/volume
Publication Year :
2014
Publisher :
Public Library of Science, 2014.

Abstract

Purpose This paper describes a novel method to automatically segment the human brainstem into midbrain and pons, called LABS: Landmark-based Automated Brainstem Segmentation. LABS processes high-resolution structural magnetic resonance images (MRIs) according to a revised landmark-based approach integrated with a thresholding method, without manual interaction. Methods This method was first tested on morphological T1-weighted MRIs of 30 healthy subjects. Its reliability was further confirmed by including neurological patients (with Alzheimer's Disease) from the ADNI repository, in whom the presence of volumetric loss within the brainstem had been previously described. Segmentation accuracies were evaluated against expert-drawn manual delineation. To evaluate the quality of LABS segmentation we used volumetric, spatial overlap and distance-based metrics. Results The comparison between the quantitative measurements provided by LABS against manual segmentations revealed excellent results in healthy controls when considering either the midbrain (DICE measures higher that 0.9; Volume ratio around 1 and Hausdorff distance around 3) or the pons (DICE measures around 0.93; Volume ratio ranging 1.024–1.05 and Hausdorff distance around 2). Similar performances were detected for AD patients considering segmentation of the pons (DICE measures higher that 0.93; Volume ratio ranging from 0.97–0.98 and Hausdorff distance ranging 1.07–1.33), while LABS performed lower for the midbrain (DICE measures ranging 0.86–0.88; Volume ratio around 0.95 and Hausdorff distance ranging 1.71–2.15). Conclusions Our study represents the first attempt to validate a new fully automated method for in vivo segmentation of two anatomically complex brainstem subregions. We retain that our method might represent a useful tool for future applications in clinical practice.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19326203
Volume :
9
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
PLoS ONE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e3ac72fd7bcd81a38148c1122bb84c03