Back to Search Start Over

INNV-27. AN INNOVATIVE VIRTUAL MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL, MULTIDISCIPLINARY NEURO-ONCOLOGY TUMOR BOARD: THE NIH-NOB EXPERIENCE DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Authors :
Varna Jammula
Surabhi Ranjan
John D. Heiss
Kayla O’Donnell
John A. Butman
James Snyder
Ukeme Ikiddeh-Barnes
Alvina Acquaye
Marta Penas-Prado
Margarita Raygada
Prashant Chittiboina
Michael Salacz
Matthew Smith-Cohn
Lisa Boris
Joseph Wooley
Nicholas Avgeropoulos
Kareem A. Zaghloul
Jan Drappatz
Edina Komlodi-Pasztor
Yeonju Kim
Funto Akindona
David Cachia
Christina Tsien
Brett Theeler
Michael Timmer
Kaitlyn Benson
Erin M. Dunbar
Martha Quezado
James Rogers
Mark R. Gilbert
James G. Smirniotopoulos
Karan Dixit
Huma Chaudhry
Kevin Camphausen
Terri Armstrong
Peter A. Forsyth
Rimas V. Lukas
Eudocia Q. Lee
Howard Colman
Stephen C Frederico
Eric Burton
Jacob Mandel
Kenneth Aldape
Orwa Aboud
Source :
Neuro-Oncology
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Oxford University Press, 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND The American Academy of Neurology Institute and Society for Neuro-Oncology recommend multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB) meetings as a quality metric in neuro-oncology. With the COVID-19 pandemic resulting in travel restrictions, we expanded our existing MTB by transitioning to a virtual format that maintained our commitment to providing consultation for primary CNS tumor cases. This transition permitted participation by neuro-oncology teams from over 30 Brain Tumor Trials Collaborative (BTTC)/National Cancer Institute-Comprehensive Oncology Network Evaluating Rare CNS Tumors (NCI-CONNECT) centers across the United States. Here, we describe results from opening our MTB remotely to these teams. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed records from remote MTB meetings held between April 2020 and March 2021. To gauge the impact of our MTB on clinical management, we administered a brief survey querying BTTC members. RESULTS Twenty-eight providers presented 41 cases during 24 virtual MTB meetings (range: 1-4 cases per meeting). Two cases (5%) were presented only for educational value. Approximately half (54%) of the cases discussed dealt with diagnosis/management of an NCI-CONNECT rare CNS tumor. During MTB discussions of the 39 cases seeking diagnosis/management recommendations, 32% received clinical trial recommendations, 10% were suggested to enroll in the NCI Neuro-Oncology Branch (NOB) Natural History Study (NCT02851706), 17% received a recommendation to obtain central neuropathology review, and 100% received recommendations for further disease management. Most BTTC survey respondents (83%) found these recommendations impactful in the management/treatment of their presented case or generally useful/informative for their clinical practice. CONCLUSION We describe the feasibility and utility of an innovative virtual multi-institutional MTB. These novel remote meetings allowed for discussion of complex neuro-oncology cases and recommendations from experts, particularly important for those with rare CNS tumors. Our study’s findings during the COVID-19 pandemic of the value of providing remote access to MTBs should apply post-pandemic.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15235866 and 15228517
Volume :
23
Issue :
Suppl 6
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Neuro-Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e38202042979cb2950734b2db58053a4