Back to Search Start Over

Breast cancer care compared with clinical Guidelines: an observational study in France

Authors :
Marie, Lebeau
Simone, Mathoulin-Pélissier
Carine, Bellera
Christine, Tunon-de-Lara
Alain, Daban
Francis, Lipinski
Dominique, Jaubert
Pierre, Ingrand
Virginie, Migeot
A, Veret
BMC, Ed.
Service de Radiothérapie [Poitiers]
Centre hospitalier universitaire de Poitiers (CHU Poitiers)
Réseau de Cancérologie d'Aquitaine
Département de recherche clinique et d'information médicale
Institut Bergonié [Bordeaux]
UNICANCER-UNICANCER
Centre d'Investigation Clinique - Epidemiologie Clinique / Essais Cliniques Bordeaux
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)
Département de chirurgie
Réseau de Cancérologie de Poitou-Charentes
Centre Oncoradiothérapie de la Côte Basque
the REPERES group
Institut Bergonié - CRLCC Bordeaux
Source :
BMC Public Health, BMC Public Health, BioMed Central, 2011, 11 (1), pp.45. ⟨10.1186/1471-2458-11-45⟩, BMC Public Health, Vol 11, Iss 1, p 45 (2011)
Publication Year :
2011
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2011.

Abstract

Background Great variability in breast cancer (BC) treatment practices according to patient, tumour or organisation of care characteristics has been reported but the relation between these factors is not well known. In two French regions, we measured compliance with Clinical Practice Guidelines for non-metastatic BC care management and identified factors associated with non-compliance at clinical and organisational levels. Methods Eligible patients had invasive unilateral BC without distant metastases and at least two contacts with one of the two regional healthcare systems (2003-2004) in the first year after diagnosis. Medical data were collected from patient medical records in all public and private hospitals (99 hospitals). The care process was defined by 20 criteria: clinical decisions for treatment and therapeutic procedures. Each criterion was classified according to level of compliance ("Compliant", "Justifiable" and "Not Compliant") and factors of non-compliance were identified (mixed effect logistic regression). Results 926 women were included. Non-compliance with clinical decisions for treatment was associated with older patient age (OR 2.1; 95%CI: 1.3-3.6) and region (OR 3.0; 95%CI: 1.2-7.4). Non-compliance with clinical decisions for radiotherapy was associated with lymph node involvement or the presence of peritumoural vascular invasion (OR 1.5; 95%CI: 1.01-2.3) and non-compliance with overall treatment (clinical decisions for treatment + therapeutic procedures) was associated with the presence of positive lymph nodes (OR 2.0; 95%CI: 1.2-3.3), grade III versus grade I (OR 2.9; 95%CI: 1.4-6.2), and one region of care versus another (OR 3.5; 95%CI: 1.7-7.1). Finally, heterogeneity of compliance in overall treatment sequence was identified between local cancer units (p < 0.05). Conclusion This study provides interesting insights into factors of non-compliance in non-metastatic BC management and could lead to quality care improvements.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14712458
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
BMC Public Health, BMC Public Health, BioMed Central, 2011, 11 (1), pp.45. ⟨10.1186/1471-2458-11-45⟩, BMC Public Health, Vol 11, Iss 1, p 45 (2011)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e2a594064c1ba3d88cf283d21401c828
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-45⟩