Back to Search
Start Over
Metabolomics, machine learning and immunohistochemistry to predict succinate dehydrogenase mutational status in phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas
- Source :
- Journal of Pathology, 251, 378-387, Journal of Pathology, 251, 4, pp. 378-387, J Pathol, Journal of Pathology, 251(4), 378-387. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., The Journal of Pathology 251(2020), 378-387
- Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Contains fulltext : 225895.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) Phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) are rare neuroendocrine tumours with a hereditary background in over one-third of patients. Mutations in succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) genes increase the risk for PPGLs and several other tumours. Mutations in subunit B (SDHB) in particular are a risk factor for metastatic disease, further highlighting the importance of identifying SDHx mutations for patient management. Genetic variants of unknown significance, where implications for the patient and family members are unclear, are a problem for interpretation. For such cases, reliable methods for evaluating protein functionality are required. Immunohistochemistry for SDHB (SDHB-IHC) is the method of choice but does not assess functionality at the enzymatic level. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based measurements of metabolite precursors and products of enzymatic reactions provide an alternative method. Here, we compare SDHB-IHC with metabolite profiling in 189 tumours from 187 PPGL patients. Besides evaluating succinate:fumarate ratios (SFRs), machine learning algorithms were developed to establish predictive models for interpreting metabolite data. Metabolite profiling showed higher diagnostic specificity compared to SDHB-IHC (99.2% versus 92.5%, p = 0.021), whereas sensitivity was comparable. Application of machine learning algorithms to metabolite profiles improved predictive ability over that of the SFR, in particular for hard-to-interpret cases of head and neck paragangliomas (AUC 0.9821 versus 0.9613, p = 0.044). Importantly, the combination of metabolite profiling with SDHB-IHC has complementary utility, as SDHB-IHC correctly classified all but one of the false negatives from metabolite profiling strategies, while metabolite profiling correctly classified all but one of the false negatives/positives from SDHB-IHC. From 186 tumours with confirmed status of SDHx variant pathogenicity, the combination of the two methods resulted in 185 correct predictions, highlighting the benefits of both strategies for patient management. © 2020 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
- Subjects :
- 0301 basic medicine
linear discriminant analysis
SDHB
Metabolite
succinate to fumarate ratio
10265 Clinic for Endocrinology and Diabetology
Adrenal Gland Neoplasms
Disease
computer.software_genre
Cohort Studies
Machine Learning
chemistry.chemical_compound
0302 clinical medicine
diagnostics
Medicine
variants of unknown significance
mass spectrometry
biology
Succinate dehydrogenase
Vascular damage Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences [Radboudumc 16]
Immunohistochemistry
Succinate Dehydrogenase
Head and Neck Neoplasms
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
610 Medicine & health
Pheochromocytoma
Machine learning
Article
Pathology and Forensic Medicine
multi-observer
Paraganglioma
03 medical and health sciences
Metabolomics
Humans
LC-MS/MS
Risk factor
Pathological
Krebs cycle metabolites
business.industry
prediction models
2734 Pathology and Forensic Medicine
030104 developmental biology
chemistry
Mutation
biology.protein
metabolite profiling
Artificial intelligence
business
computer
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 00223417
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of Pathology, 251, 378-387, Journal of Pathology, 251, 4, pp. 378-387, J Pathol, Journal of Pathology, 251(4), 378-387. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., The Journal of Pathology 251(2020), 378-387
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....e28bb0cac049562256251ada1369942a