Back to Search
Start Over
The importance of different frailty domains in a population based sample in England
- Source :
- BMC Geriatrics, BMC Geriatrics, Vol 20, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2020), Arnadottir, S A, Bruce, J, Lall, R, Withers, E J, Underwood, M, Shaw, F, Sheridan, R, Hossain, A, Lamb, S E, Underwood, M, Martin, F, Yardley, L, Skelton, D, Willett, K, Eldridge, S, Slowther, A M, Duggan, S, Bruce, J, Hennings, S, Withers, E, Mant, R, Rai, R, Turner, C, Andrews, A, Fearn, R, Finnegan, S, Walker, N, Potter, R, Lall, R, Hulme, C, Bojke, C, Longo, R, Finnegan, S, Westacott, K, Ralhan, S, Sheridan, R, Treml, J, Sheridan, R, Riglin, J, Gordjin, H, Dutta, R, Burns, J, Treml, J, Shaw, F, Davison, J, Willis, A, Muthiah, C & Adjei, H 2020, ' The importance of different frailty domains in a population based sample in England ', BMC Geriatrics, vol. 20, no. 1, 16 (2020) . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1411-9
- Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Background The aim was to estimate the prevalence of frailty and relative contribution of physical/balance, nutritive, cognitive and sensory frailty to important adverse health states (falls, physical activity levels, outdoor mobility, problems in self-care or usual activities, and lack of energy or accomplishment) in an English cohort by age and sex. Methods Analysis of baseline data from a cohort of 9803 community-dwelling participants in a clinical trial. The sample was drawn from a random selection of all people aged 70 or more registered with 63 general practices across England. Data were collected by postal questionnaire. Frailty was measured with the Strawbridge questionnaire. We used cross sectional, multivariate logistic regression to estimate the association between frailty domains and known correlates and adjusted for age. Some models were stratified by sex. Results Mean age of participants was 78 years (sd 5.7), range 70 to 101 and 47.5% (4653/9803) were men. The prevalence of overall frailty was 20.7% (2005/9671) and there was no difference in prevalence by sex (Odds Ratio 0.98; 95% Confidence Interval 0.89 to 1.08). Sensory frailty was the most common and this was reported by more men (1823/4586) than women (1469/5056; Odds Ratio for sensory frailty 0.62, 95% Confidence Interval 0.57 to 0.68). Men were less likely than women to have physical or nutritive frailty. Physical frailty had the strongest independent associations with adverse health states. However, sensory frailty was independently associated with falls, less frequent walking, problems in self-care and usual activities, lack of energy and accomplishment. Conclusions Physical frailty was more strongly associated with adverse health states, but sensory frailty was much more common. The health gain from intervention for sensory frailty in England is likely to be substantial, particularly for older men. Sensory frailty should be explored further as an important target of intervention to improve health outcomes for older people both at clinical and population level. Trial registration ISRCTN71002650.
- Subjects :
- Male
Gerontology
Aging
Vision
Frail Elderly
Sensation
Poison control
lcsh:Geriatrics
Logistic regression
Suicide prevention
Occupational safety and health
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Hearing
Injury prevention
Humans
Medicine
030212 general & internal medicine
Geriatric Assessment
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Frailty
business.industry
Odds ratio
Population characteristics
Confidence interval
lcsh:RC952-954.6
Cross-Sectional Studies
England
Cohort
Physical and Mental Health
Female
Independent Living
Geriatrics and Gerontology
business
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Research Article
RC
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 71002650 and 14712318
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- BMC Geriatrics, BMC Geriatrics, Vol 20, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2020), Arnadottir, S A, Bruce, J, Lall, R, Withers, E J, Underwood, M, Shaw, F, Sheridan, R, Hossain, A, Lamb, S E, Underwood, M, Martin, F, Yardley, L, Skelton, D, Willett, K, Eldridge, S, Slowther, A M, Duggan, S, Bruce, J, Hennings, S, Withers, E, Mant, R, Rai, R, Turner, C, Andrews, A, Fearn, R, Finnegan, S, Walker, N, Potter, R, Lall, R, Hulme, C, Bojke, C, Longo, R, Finnegan, S, Westacott, K, Ralhan, S, Sheridan, R, Treml, J, Sheridan, R, Riglin, J, Gordjin, H, Dutta, R, Burns, J, Treml, J, Shaw, F, Davison, J, Willis, A, Muthiah, C & Adjei, H 2020, ' The importance of different frailty domains in a population based sample in England ', BMC Geriatrics, vol. 20, no. 1, 16 (2020) . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1411-9
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....e12281415b7b5f3c0711c8e589dc4e98