Back to Search Start Over

Favipiravir in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 (PIONEER trial): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial of early intervention versus standard care

Authors :
Pallav L Shah
Christopher M Orton
Beatriz Grinsztejn
Gavin C Donaldson
Brenda Crabtree Ramírez
James Tonkin
Breno R Santos
Sandra W Cardoso
Andrew I Ritchie
Francesca Conway
Maria P D Riberio
Dexter J Wiseman
Anand Tana
Bavithra Vijayakumar
Cielito Caneja
Craig Leaper
Bobby Mann
Anda Samson
Pankaj K Bhavsar
Marta Boffito
Mark R Johnson
Anton Pozniak
Michael Pelly
Damon Foster
Nadia Shabbir
Simon Connolly
Andrea Cartier
Sajjida Jaffer
Carmen Winpenny
Doris Daby
Samuel Pepper
Christine Adamson
Jamie Carungcong
Kribashnie Nundlall
Serge Fedele
Pardina Samson-Fessale
Alexandra Schoolmeesters
Laura Gomes de Almeida Martins
Rhian Bull
Patricia Correia Da Costa
Carina Bautista
Maria Eleanor Flores
Shameera Maheswaran
Lester Macabodbod
Rosalie Houseman
Marie-Louise Svensson
Amrinder Sayan
Carrie Fung
Justin Garner
Dilys Lai
Mark Nelson
Luke Moore
Shewta Gidwani
Gary Davies
Beatrice Ouma
Clovis Salinos
Jad Salha
Redasaad Yassein
Abdul Abbasi
Metod Oblak
Angelica Steward
Mini Thankachen
Amy Barker
Candida Fernandes
Veronica Beatriz
Leah Flores
Alfredo Soler-Carracedo
Alessandra Rocca
Carmela Martella
Charlotte Lloyd
Ciara Nolan
Latoya Horsford
Laura Martins
Lervina Thomas
Mark Winstanley
Miriam Bourke
Nicholas Branch
Orhan Orhan
Richard Morton
Sangeetha Saunder
Shashank Patil
Stephen Hughes
Wu Zhe
Ashley De Leon
Ayaan Farah
Grace Rya
Katrin Alizadeh
Kirsty Leong
Laure Trepte
Nupur Goel
Patrick McGown
Ursula Kirwan
Tamiris Vilela Baião
Luana Marins
Sandro Nazer
Raquel Malaguthi de Souza
Marcella Feitosa
Flavia Lessa
Elizabeth Silva de Magalhães
Jamile Costenaro
Rita de Cassia Alves Lira
Ana Carolina
Andréa Cauduro de Castro
Andre Machado Da Silva
Dimas Kliemann
Rita De Cassia Alves Lira
Gemma Walker
Donna Norton
Vicki Lowthorpe
Monica Ivan
Patrick Lillie
Nicholas Easom
Juan Sierra Madero
Álvaro López Iñiguez
Guadalupe Patricia Muñuzuri Nájera
Claudia Paola Alarcón Murra
Audelia Alanis Vega
Teresa Muñoz Trejo
Olivia Pérez Rodríguez
Source :
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 11:415-424
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2023.

Abstract

COVID-19 has overwhelmed health services globally. Oral antiviral therapies are licensed worldwide, but indications and efficacy rates vary. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral favipiravir in patients hospitalised with COVID-19.We conducted a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial of oral favipiravir in adult patients who were newly admitted to hospital with proven or suspected COVID-19 across five sites in the UK (n=2), Brazil (n=2) and Mexico (n=1). Using a permuted block design, eligible and consenting participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral favipiravir (1800 mg twice daily for 1 day; 800 mg twice daily for 9 days) plus standard care, or standard care alone. All caregivers and patients were aware of allocation and those analysing data were aware of the treatment groups. The prespecified primary outcome was the time from randomisation to recovery, censored at 28 days, which was assessed using an intention-to-treat approach. Post-hoc analyses were used to assess the efficacy of favipiravir in patients aged younger than 60 years, and in patients aged 60 years and older. The trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04373733.Between May 5, 2020 and May 26, 2021, we assessed 503 patients for eligibility, of whom 499 were randomly assigned to favipiravir and standard care (n=251) or standard care alone (n=248). There was no significant difference between those who received favipiravir and standard care, relative to those who received standard care alone in time to recovery in the overall study population (hazard ratio [HR] 1·06 [95% CI 0·89-1·27]; n=499; p=0·52). Post-hoc analyses showed a faster rate of recovery in patients younger than 60 years who received favipiravir and standard care versus those who had standard care alone (HR 1·35 [1·06-1·72]; n=247; p=0·01). 36 serious adverse events were observed in 27 (11%) of 251 patients administered favipiravir and standard care, and 33 events were observed in 27 (11%) of 248 patients receiving standard care alone, with infectious, respiratory, and cardiovascular events being the most numerous. There was no significant between-group difference in serious adverse events per patient (p=0·87).Favipiravir does not improve clinical outcomes in all patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19, however, patients younger than 60 years might have a beneficial clinical response. The indiscriminate use of favipiravir globally should be cautioned, and further high-quality studies of antiviral agents, and their potential treatment combinations, are warranted in COVID-19.LifeArc and CW+.

Details

ISSN :
22132600
Volume :
11
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e0f0e6ef99a6e8cee9a438b2282c5402
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(22)00412-x