Back to Search Start Over

Subsequent Surgery After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Rates and Risk Factors From a Multicenter Cohort

Authors :
David Y, Ding
Alan L, Zhang
Christina R, Allen
Allen F, Anderson
Daniel E, Cooper
Thomas M, DeBerardino
Warren R, Dunn
Amanda K, Haas
Laura J, Huston
Brett Brick A, Lantz
Barton, Mann
Kurt P, Spindler
Michael J, Stuart
Rick W, Wright
John P, Albright
Annunziato Ned, Amendola
Jack T, Andrish
Christopher C, Annunziata
Robert A, Arciero
Bernard R, Bach
Champ L, Baker
Arthur R, Bartolozzi
Keith M, Baumgarten
Jeffery R, Bechler
Jeffrey H, Berg
Geoffrey A, Bernas
Stephen F, Brockmeier
Robert H, Brophy
Charles A, Bush-Joseph
J Brad, Butler
John D, Campbell
James L, Carey
James E, Carpenter
Brian J, Cole
Jonathan M, Cooper
Charles L, Cox
R Alexander, Creighton
Diane L, Dahm
Tal S, David
David C, Flanigan
Robert W, Frederick
Theodore J, Ganley
Elizabeth A, Garofoli
Charles J, Gatt
Steven R, Gecha
James Robert, Giffin
Sharon L, Hame
Jo A, Hannafin
Christopher D, Harner
Norman Lindsay, Harris
Keith S, Hechtman
Elliott B, Hershman
Rudolf G, Hoellrich
Timothy M, Hosea
David C, Johnson
Timothy S, Johnson
Morgan H, Jones
Christopher C, Kaeding
Ganesh V, Kamath
Thomas E, Klootwyk
Bruce A, Levy
C Benjamin, Ma
G Peter, Maiers
Robert G, Marx
Matthew J, Matava
Gregory M, Mathien
David R, McAllister
Eric C, McCarty
Robert G, McCormack
Bruce S, Miller
Carl W, Nissen
Daniel F, O'Neill
Brett D, Owens
Richard D, Parker
Mark L, Purnell
Arun J, Ramappa
Michael A, Rauh
Arthur C, Rettig
Jon K, Sekiya
Kevin G, Shea
Orrin H, Sherman
James R, Slauterbeck
Matthew V, Smith
Jeffrey T, Spang
Steven J, Svoboda
Timothy N, Taft
Joachim J, Tenuta
Edwin M, Tingstad
Armando F, Vidal
Darius G, Viskontas
Richard A, White
James S, Williams
Michelle L, Wolcott
Brian R, Wolf
James J, York
Source :
The American journal of sports medicine. 45(9)
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Background: While revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) can be performed to restore knee stability and improve patient activity levels, outcomes after this surgery are reported to be inferior to those after primary ACLR. Further reoperations after revision ACLR can have an even more profound effect on patient satisfaction and outcomes. However, there is a current lack of information regarding the rate and risk factors for subsequent surgery after revision ACLR. Purpose: To report the rate of reoperations, procedures performed, and risk factors for a reoperation 2 years after revision ACLR. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 1205 patients who underwent revision ACLR were enrolled in the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) between 2006 and 2011, composing the prospective cohort. Two-year questionnaire follow-up was obtained for 989 patients (82%), while telephone follow-up was obtained for 1112 patients (92%). If a patient reported having undergone subsequent surgery, operative reports detailing the subsequent procedure(s) were obtained and categorized. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine independent risk factors for a reoperation. Results: Of the 1112 patients included in the analysis, 122 patients (11%) underwent a total of 172 subsequent procedures on the ipsilateral knee at 2-year follow-up. Of the reoperations, 27% were meniscal procedures (69% meniscectomy, 26% repair), 19% were subsequent revision ACLR, 17% were cartilage procedures (61% chondroplasty, 17% microfracture, 13% mosaicplasty), 11% were hardware removal, and 9% were procedures for arthrofibrosis. Multivariate analysis revealed that patients aged Conclusion: There was a significant reoperation rate after revision ACLR at 2 years (11%), with meniscal procedures most commonly involved. Independent risk factors for subsequent surgery on the ipsilateral knee included age

Details

ISSN :
15523365
Volume :
45
Issue :
9
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The American journal of sports medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e0d8f25ee3880ef65c9ef61b6415e4a2