Back to Search Start Over

Measuring surface charge: Why experimental characterization and molecular modeling should be coupled

Authors :
Oriane Bonhomme
Li Fu
Remco Hartkamp
Jean-François Dufrêche
Anne-Laure Biance
Laurent Joly
Institut Charles Gerhardt Montpellier - Institut de Chimie Moléculaire et des Matériaux de Montpellier (ICGM ICMMM)
Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Montpellier (ENSCM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Université Montpellier 1 (UM1)-Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques (UM2)-Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC)
Institut Lumière Matière [Villeurbanne] (ILM)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL)
Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon
School of Software (THSS)
Tsinghua University [Beijing] (THU)
Liquides Ioniques et Interfaces Chargées (LI2C)
Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC)-Ecole Superieure de Physique et de Chimie Industrielles de la Ville de Paris (ESPCI Paris)
Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
ANR-16-CE06-0004,NECtAR,Interfaces réactives pour la conversion d'énergie nanofluidique(2016)
Source :
Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, Elsevier, 2018, 37, pp.101-114. ⟨10.1016/j.cocis.2018.08.001⟩, Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, 37
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2018.

Abstract

Surface charge controls many static and dynamic properties of soft matter and micro/nanofluidic systems, but its unambiguous measurement forms a challenge. Standard characterization methods typically probe an effective surface charge, which provides limited insight into the distribution and dynamics of charge across the interface, and which cannot predict consistently all surface-charge-governed properties. New experimental approaches provide local information on both structure and transport, but models are typically required to interpret raw data. Conversely, molecular dynamics simulations have helped showing the limits of standard models and developing more accurate ones, but their reliability is limited by the empirical interaction potentials they are usually based on. This review highlights recent developments and limitations in both experimental and computational research focusing on the liquid-solid interface. Based on recent studies, we make the case that coupling of experiments and simulations is pivotal tomitigate methodological shortcomings and address open problems pertaining to charged interfaces.<br />Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science (2018)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13590294 and 18790399
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, Elsevier, 2018, 37, pp.101-114. ⟨10.1016/j.cocis.2018.08.001⟩, Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, 37
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e08164b915635fa5a7d8817471f4e096