Back to Search Start Over

Effectiveness and safety of the adjunctive use of an internet-based self-management intervention for borderline personality disorder in addition to care as usual: results from a randomised controlled trial

Authors :
Thomas Berger
Johannes Mayer
Ulrich Schweiger
Jan Philipp Klein
Bernhard Wellhöfer
Stefan Borgwardt
Gitta A. Jacob
Andrea Hauer-von Mauschwitz
Eva Fassbinder
Source :
Klein, Jan Philipp; Hauer-von Mauschwitz, Andrea; Fassbinder, Eva; Berger, Thomas; Mayer, Johannes; Borgwardt, Stefan; Wellhöfer, Bernhard; Schweiger, Ulrich; Jacob, Gitta (2021). Effectiveness and safety of the adjunctive use of an internet-based self-management intervention for borderline personality disorder in addition to care as usual: results from a randomised controlled trial. BMJ open, 11(9), e047771. BMJ Publishing Group 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047771 , BMJ Open, Vol 11, Iss 9 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
BMJ Publishing Group, 2021.

Abstract

ImportanceBorderline personality disorder (BPD) is a severe mental disorder that is often inadequately treated.ObjectiveTo determine if adding a self-management intervention to care as usual (CAU) is effective and safe.DesignRandomised, controlled, rater-blind trial. Duration of treatment and assessments: 12 months.SettingSecondary care, recruited mainly via the internet.ParticipantsPatients with BPD and BPD Severity Index (BPDSI) of at least 15.InterventionsCAU by treating psychiatrist and/or psychotherapist alone or adjunctive use of an internet-based self-management intervention that is based on schema therapy (priovi).Main outcome measureOutcomes were assessed by trained raters. The primary outcome was change in BPDSI. The safety outcome was the number of serious adverse events (SAEs). The primary outcome time point was 12 months after randomisation.ResultsOf 383 participants assessed for eligibility, 204 were included (91.7% female, mean age: 32.4 years; 74% were in psychotherapy and 26% were in psychiatric treatment). The slope of BPDSI change did not differ significantly between groups from baseline to 12 months (F3,248= 1.857, p=0.14). At 12 months, the within-group effect sizes were d=1.38 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.68) for the intervention group and d=1.02 (95% CI 0.73 to 1.31) for the control group. The between-group effect size was d=0.27 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.55) in the intention-to-treat sample and d=0.39 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.68) for those who used the intervention for at least 3 hours (per-protocol sample). We found no significant differences in SAEs.ConclusionsWe have not found a significant effect in favour of the intervention. This might be due to the unexpectedly large effect in the group receiving CAU by a psychiatrist and/or psychotherapist alone.Trial registrationNCT03418142.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Klein, Jan Philipp; Hauer-von Mauschwitz, Andrea; Fassbinder, Eva; Berger, Thomas; Mayer, Johannes; Borgwardt, Stefan; Wellh&#246;fer, Bernhard; Schweiger, Ulrich; Jacob, Gitta (2021). Effectiveness and safety of the adjunctive use of an internet-based self-management intervention for borderline personality disorder in addition to care as usual: results from a randomised controlled trial. BMJ open, 11(9), e047771. BMJ Publishing Group 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047771 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047771>, BMJ Open, Vol 11, Iss 9 (2021)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e0703ba23f3683675604fe775a78b3b9
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.48350/162384