Back to Search
Start Over
No Need for Routine Drainage After Pancreatic Head Resection:the Dual Center Randomized Controlled PANDRA-Trial (ISRCTN04937707)
- Source :
- HPB. 21:S718-S719
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2019.
-
Abstract
- Objective This dual-center, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial aimed to prove that omission of drains does not increase reintervention rates after pancreatic surgery. Background There is considerable uncertainty regarding intra-abdominal drainage after pancreatoduodenectomy. Methods Patients undergoing pancreatic head resection with pancreaticojejunal anastomosis were randomized to intra-abdominal drainage versus no drainage. Primary endpoint was overall reintervention rate (relaparotomy or radiologic intervention). Secondary endpoints were clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (grade B/C), mortality, morbidity, and hospital stay. The planned sample size was 188 patients per group. Results A total of 438 patients were randomized. Forty-three patients (9.8%) were excluded because no pancreatic anastomosis was performed, and 395 patients (202 drain, 193 no-drain) were analyzed. Reintervention rates were not inferior in the no-drain group (drain 21.3%, no-drain 16.6%; P = 0.0004). Overall in-hospital mortality (3.0%) was the same in both groups (drain 3.0%, no-drain 3.1%; P = 0.936). Overall surgical morbidity (41.8%) was comparable (P = 0.741). Clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (grade B/C: drain 11.9%, no-drain 5.7%; P = 0.030) and fistula-associated complications (drain 26.4%; no drain 13.0%; P = 0.0008) were significantly reduced in the no-drain group. Operation time (P = 0.093), postoperative hemorrhage (P = 0.174), intra-abdominal abscess formation (P = 0.199), biliary leakage (P = 0.382), delayed gastric emptying (P = 0.062), burst abdomen (P = 0.480), wound infection (P = 0.758), and hospital stay (P = 0.487) did not show significant differences. Conclusions Omission of drains was not inferior to intra-abdominal drainage in terms of postoperative reintervention and superior in terms of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula rate and fistula-associated complications. There is no need for routine prophylactic drainage after pancreatic resection with pancreaticojejunal anastomosis.
- Subjects :
- medicine.medical_specialty
medicine.medical_treatment
030230 surgery
Anastomosis
Pancreatic head
law.invention
Resection
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Randomized controlled trial
law
Clinical endpoint
Medicine
Center (algebra and category theory)
Drainage
Abscess
Gastric emptying
Hepatology
business.industry
Gastroenterology
medicine.disease
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Surgery
medicine.anatomical_structure
Pancreatic fistula
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Anesthesia
Pancreas
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 1365182X
- Volume :
- 21
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- HPB
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....df6b0549d35fa510a1140c67080ae8d4
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2019.10.620