Local impedance-guided ablation and ultra-high density mapping versus conventional or contact force-guided ablation with mapping for treatment of cavotricuspid isthmus dependent atrial flutter

Local impedance (LI) guided ablation as a method of judging lesion effectiveness for cavotricuspid isthmus dependent atrial flutter (CTI-AFL), and ultra-high density (UHD) mapping when breakthrough occurred across an ablation line has not previously been assessed.This retrospective observational study evaluated patients undergoing CTI-AFL ablation using conventional, contact force (CF) and LI guided strategies. Ablation metrics were collected, and in the LI cohort, the use of UHD mapping for breakthrough evaluated.30 patients were included, 10 per group. Mean total ablation time was significantly shorter with LI (3.2 ± 1.3min) vs conventional (5.6 ± 2.7min) and CF (5.7 ± 2.0min, p = 0.0042). Time from start of ablation to CTI block was numerically shorter with LI (14.2 ± 8.0min) vs conventional and CF (19.7 ± 14.1 and 22.5 ± 19.1min, p = 0.4408). Mean lesion duration was significantly shorter with LI, but there were no differences in the number of lesions required to achieve block, procedural success, complication rates or recurrence. 15/30 patients did not achieve block following first-pass ablation. UHD mapping rapidly identified breakthrough in the five LI patients, including epicardial-endocardial breakthrough (EEB).- The use of LI during ablation for real-time lesion assessment was as efficacious as the conventional and CF methods. UHD mapping rapidly identified breakthrough, including EEB.