Back to Search Start Over

Societal shifts due to COVID-19 reveal large-scale complexities and feedbacks between atmospheric chemistry and climate change

Authors :
Joshua L. Laughner
David S. Schimel
Daniel L. Goldberg
Eric A. Kort
Alexander J. Turner
Helen Fitzmaurice
Randall V. Martin
Jessica L. Neu
Hansen Cao
Benjamin Poulter
Daven K. Henze
Joost A. de Gouw
Jinsol Kim
Paul O. Wennberg
David Crisp
Stanley P. Sander
Zhao-Cheng Zeng
Muye Ru
Jeremy Avise
Bart E Croes
Cesunica E. Ivey
Neil C. Swart
Nicole S. Lovenduski
Lesley Ott
Junjie Liu
Sina Hasheminassab
Kevin R. Gurney
Kazuyuki Miyazaki
Kelley C. Barsanti
Dylan B. A. Jones
Abhishek Chatterjee
Zhu Liu
John C. Fyfe
Susan C. Anenberg
Kevin W. Bowman
Yuk L. Yung
Francesca M. Hopkins
Galen A. McKinley
Annmarie Eldering
Source :
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol 118, iss 46
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
National Academy of Sciences, 2021.

Abstract

Significance The COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns caused significant changes to human activity that temporarily altered our imprint on the atmosphere, providing a brief glimpse of potential future changes in atmospheric composition. This event demonstrated key feedbacks within and between air quality and the carbon cycle: Improvements in air quality increased the lifetime of methane (an important greenhouse gas), while unusually hot weather and intense wildfires in Los Angeles drove poor air quality. This shows that efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve air quality cannot be considered separately.<br />The COVID-19 global pandemic and associated government lockdowns dramatically altered human activity, providing a window into how changes in individual behavior, enacted en masse, impact atmospheric composition. The resulting reductions in anthropogenic activity represent an unprecedented event that yields a glimpse into a future where emissions to the atmosphere are reduced. Furthermore, the abrupt reduction in emissions during the lockdown periods led to clearly observable changes in atmospheric composition, which provide direct insight into feedbacks between the Earth system and human activity. While air pollutants and greenhouse gases share many common anthropogenic sources, there is a sharp difference in the response of their atmospheric concentrations to COVID-19 emissions changes, due in large part to their different lifetimes. Here, we discuss several key takeaways from modeling and observational studies. First, despite dramatic declines in mobility and associated vehicular emissions, the atmospheric growth rates of greenhouse gases were not slowed, in part due to decreased ocean uptake of CO2 and a likely increase in CH4 lifetime from reduced NOx emissions. Second, the response of O3 to decreased NOx emissions showed significant spatial and temporal variability, due to differing chemical regimes around the world. Finally, the overall response of atmospheric composition to emissions changes is heavily modulated by factors including carbon-cycle feedbacks to CH4 and CO2, background pollutant levels, the timing and location of emissions changes, and climate feedbacks on air quality, such as wildfires and the ozone climate penalty.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol 118, iss 46
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....dea25dcc96913884191a239db7980cf0