Back to Search
Start Over
Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnostic work-up of idiopathic acute pancreatitis (PICUS)
- Source :
- BMJ Open, 10(8):035504. BMJ Publishing Group, BMJ Open, Vol 10, Iss 8 (2020), BMJ Open, 10, 8, BMJ Open, 10(8). BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP, BMJ Open, 10(8):e035504. BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP, BMJ Open, 10(8):e035504. BMJ Publishing Group, BMJ open, 10(8). BMJ Publishing Group, BMJ Open, BMJ Open, 10
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP, 2020.
-
Abstract
- IntroductionIdiopathic acute pancreatitis (IAP) remains a dilemma for physicians as it is uncertain whether patients with IAP may actually have an occult aetiology. It is unclear to what extent additional diagnostic modalities such as endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) are warranted after a first episode of IAP in order to uncover this aetiology. Failure to timely determine treatable aetiologies delays appropriate treatment and might subsequently cause recurrence of acute pancreatitis. Therefore, the aim of the Pancreatitis of Idiopathic origin: Clinical added value of endoscopic UltraSonography (PICUS) Study is to determine the value of routine EUS in determining the aetiology of pancreatitis in patients with a first episode of IAP.Methods and analysisPICUS is designed as a multicentre prospective cohort study of 106 patients with a first episode of IAP after complete standard diagnostic work-up, in whom a diagnostic EUS will be performed. Standard diagnostic work-up will include a complete personal and family history, laboratory tests including serum alanine aminotransferase, calcium and triglyceride levels and imaging by transabdominal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography after clinical recovery from the acute pancreatitis episode. The primary outcome measure is detection of aetiology by EUS. Secondary outcome measures include pancreatitis recurrence rate, severity of recurrent pancreatitis, readmission, additional interventions, complications, length of hospital stay, quality of life, mortality and costs, during a follow-up period of 12 months.Ethics and disseminationPICUS is conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. Five medical ethics review committees assessed PICUS (Medical Ethics Review Committee of Academic Medical Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Radboud University Medical Center, Erasmus Medical Center and Maastricht University Medical Center). The results will be submitted for publication in an international peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration numberNetherlands Trial Registry (NL7066). Prospectively registered.
- Subjects :
- medicine.medical_specialty
etiology
infected necrotizing pancreatitis
Other Research Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences [Radboudumc 0]
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
magnetic-resonance cholangiopancreatography
hepatobiliary disease
Endosonography
Recurrent pancreatitis
All institutes and research themes of the Radboud University Medical Center
GALLSTONE PANCREATITIS
medicine
Tumours of the digestive tract Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences [Radboudumc 14]
MANAGEMENT
Humans
Multicenter Studies as Topic
EPIDEMIOLOGY
Prospective Studies
endoscopy
Prospective cohort study
EUS
Netherlands
First episode
COMPLICATIONS
ATLANTA CLASSIFICATION
business.industry
ultrasound
Hepatobiliary disease
General Medicine
Guideline
medicine.disease
Reconstructive and regenerative medicine Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences [Radboudumc 10]
Pancreatitis
Acute Disease
Emergency medicine
Good clinical practice
Quality of Life
Acute pancreatitis
Medicine
business
pancreatic disease
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 20446055
- Volume :
- 10
- Issue :
- 8
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- BMJ Open
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....dd8e44a74970e541acc2e520c20612dc