Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of reconstructive techniques following oncologic intraarticular resection of proximal humerus

Authors :
Alexander G. Athey
Matthew T. Houdek
Jonathan D. Barlow
Peter S. Rose
Bassem T. Elhassan
Mark E. Morrey
Brandon R. Bukowski
Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo
Eric R. Wagner
Source :
Journal of surgical oncologyREFERENCES. 123(1)
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The proximal humerus is a common site of primary and metastatic disease in the upper extremity. Historically, the goal of a hemiarthroplasty reconstruction was to provide a stable platform for hand and elbow function, with limited shoulder function. Techniques utilizing a reverse endoprosthesis (endoprosthetic replacement [EPR]) and allograft-prosthetic composite (APC) have been developed; however, there is a paucity of comparative studies. METHODS A total of 83 (42 females, 41 males) patients undergoing an intraarticular resection of the humerus were reviewed. Reconstructions included 30 reverse and 53 hemiarthroplasty; including hemiarthroplasty EPR (n = 36) and APC (n = 17), and reverse EPR (n = 20) and APC (n = 10). RESULTS Reverse reconstructions had improved forward elevation (85° vs. 44°, p

Details

ISSN :
10969098
Volume :
123
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of surgical oncologyREFERENCES
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....dd8ce8a323cd058636f9529fd7d4779a