Back to Search Start Over

Implications of climate model biases and downscaling on crop model simulated climate change impacts

Authors :
D.G. Miller
Gianni Bellocchi
Davide Cammarano
Mike Rivington
Keith Matthews
The James Hutton Institute
Unité Mixte de Recherche sur l'Ecosystème Prairial - UMR (UREP)
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-VetAgro Sup - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur et de recherche en alimentation, santé animale, sciences agronomiques et de l'environnement (VAS)
UR 0874 Unité de recherche sur l'Ecosystème Prairial
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Unité de recherche sur l'Ecosystème Prairial (UREP)-Ecologie des Forêts, Prairies et milieux Aquatiques (EFPA)
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)
Source :
ASA/CSSA/SSSA/ESA 2015 Joint Annual Meeting, ASA/CSSA/SSSA/ESA 2015 Joint Annual Meeting, Nov 2015, Minneapolis, MN, United States. 3 p, ASA/CSSA/SSSA/ESA 2015 Joint Annual Meeting, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2015-11-15-2015-11-18, European Journal of Agronomy, European Journal of Agronomy, Elsevier, 2017, 88, pp.63-75. ⟨10.1016/j.eja.2016.05.012⟩
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2015.

Abstract

International audience; In estimating responses of crops to future climate realisations, it is necessary to understand and differentiate sources of uncertainty. This paper considers the specific aspect of input weather data quality from a Regional Climate Model (RCM) leading to differences in estimates made by three crop models. The availability of hindcast RCM estimates enables comparison of crop model outputs derived from observed and modelled weather data. Errors in estimating the past climate implies biases in future projections, and thus affect modelled crop responses. We investigate the complexities in using climate model projections representing different spatial scales within climate change impacts and adaptation studies. This is illustrated by simulating spring barley with three crop models run using site-specific observed (12 UK sites), original (50 x 50 km) and bias corrected downscaled (site-specific) hindcast (1960-1990) weather data from the HadRM3 RCM. Though the bias correction downscaling method improved the match between observed and hindcast data, this did not always translate into better matching of crop model estimates. At four sites the original HadRM3 data produced near identical mean simulated yield values as from the observed weather data, despite evaluated (observed-hindcast) differences. This is likely due to compensating errors in the input weather data and non-linearity in the crop models processes, making interpretation of results problematic. Understanding how biases in climate data manifest themselves in individual crop models gives greater confidence in the utility of the estimates produced using downscaled future climate projections and crop model ensembles. The results have implications on how future projections of climate change impacts are interpreted. Fundamentally, considerable care is required in determining the impact weather data sources have in climate change impact and adaptation studies, whether from individual models or ensembles. Crown Copyright (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
11610301
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
ASA/CSSA/SSSA/ESA 2015 Joint Annual Meeting, ASA/CSSA/SSSA/ESA 2015 Joint Annual Meeting, Nov 2015, Minneapolis, MN, United States. 3 p, ASA/CSSA/SSSA/ESA 2015 Joint Annual Meeting, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2015-11-15-2015-11-18, European Journal of Agronomy, European Journal of Agronomy, Elsevier, 2017, 88, pp.63-75. ⟨10.1016/j.eja.2016.05.012⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....dc2c97f798757c9c8e09c3b59f507918