Back to Search Start Over

A prospective evaluation of early detection biomarkers for ovarian cancer in the European EPIC cohort

Authors :
Jonas Manjer
Antonia Trichopoulou
Kim Overvad
Elisabete Weiderpass
Sylvie Mesrine
Eric J. Duell
Kathryn L. Terry
Melissa A. Merritt
María José Sánchez
H. Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita
Helena Schock
Petra H.M. Peeters
Nicholas J. Wareham
Karl Smith Byrne
Vassiliki Benetou
Allison F. Vitonis
Rudolf Kaaks
Sabina Rinaldi
Annika Idahl
Raina N. Fichorova
Renée T. Fortner
Pagona Lagiou
Eva Lundin
Elio Riboli
Anne Tjønneland
Marc J. Gunter
Elisabetta Kuhn
Heiner Boeing
Daniel W. Cramer
Theron Johnson
N. Charlotte Onland-Moret
Inger T. Gram
Karin Jirström
Carmen Navarro
Vittorio Krogh
Nerea Etxezarreta
Gianluca Severi
Laure Dossus
Eva Ardanaz
Hidemi S. Yamamoto
Ruth C. Travis
Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault
Salvatore Panico
Kay-Tee Khaw
Anika Hüsing
University Medical Center Utrecht
Terry, Kathryn L
Schock, Helena
Fortner, Renée T
Hüsing, Anika
Fichorova, Raina N
Yamamoto, Hidemi S
Vitonis, Allison F
Johnson, Theron
Overvad, Kim
Tjønneland, Anne
Boutron Ruault, Marie Christine
Mesrine, Sylvie
Severi, Gianluca
Dossus, Laure
Rinaldi, Sabina
Boeing, Heiner
Benetou, Vassiliki
Lagiou, Pagona
Trichopoulou, Antonia
Krogh, Vittorio
Kuhn, Elisabetta
Panico, Salvatore
Bueno de Mesquita, H. Ba
Onland Moret, N. Charlotte
Peeters, Petra H
Gram, Inger Torhild
Weiderpass, Elisabete
Duell, Eric J
Sanchez, Maria Jose
Ardanaz, Eva
Etxezarreta, Nerea
Navarro, Carmen
Idahl, Annika
Lundin, Eva
Jirström, Karin
Manjer, Jona
Wareham, Nicholas J
Khaw, Kay Tee
Byrne, Karl Smith
Travis, Ruth C
Gunter, Marc J
Merritt, Melissa A
Riboli, Elio
Cramer, Daniel W
Kaaks, Rudolf
Source :
Terry, K L, Schock, H, Fortner, R T, Hüsing, A, Fichorova, R N, Yamamoto, H S, Vitonis, A F, Johnson, T, Overvad, K, Tjønneland, A, Boutron-Ruault, M-C, Mesrine, S, Severi, G, Dossus, L, Rinaldi, S, Boeing, H, Benetou, V, Lagiou, P, Trichopoulou, A, Krogh, V, Kuhn, E, Panico, S, Bueno-de-Mesquita, H B, Onland-Moret, N C, Peeters, P H, Gram, I T, Weiderpass, E, Duell, E J, Sanchez, M-J, Ardanaz, E, Etxezarreta, N, Navarro, C, Idahl, A, Lundin, E, Jirström, K, Manjer, J, Wareham, N J, Khaw, K-T, Smith Byrne, K, Travis, R C, Gunter, M J, Merritt, M A, Riboli, E, Cramer, D & Kaaks, R 2016, ' A prospective evaluation of early detection biomarkers for ovarian cancer in the European EPIC cohort ', Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 22, no. 18, pp. 4664-75 . https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0316, Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya, instname, Clinical Cancer Research, 22(18), 4664. American Association for Cancer Research Inc., Dipòsit Digital de la UB, Universidad de Barcelona
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Purpose: About 60% of ovarian cancers are diagnosed at late stage, when 5-year survival is less than 30% in contrast to 90% for local disease. This has prompted search for early detection biomarkers. For initial testing, specimens taken months or years before ovarian cancer diagnosis are the best source of information to evaluate early detection biomarkers. Here we evaluate the most promising ovarian cancer screening biomarkers in prospectively collected samples from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study. Experimental Design: We measured CA125, HE4, CA72.4, and CA15.3 in 810 invasive epithelial ovarian cancer cases and 1,939 controls. We calculated the sensitivity at 95% and 98% specificity as well as area under the receiver operator curve (C-statistic) for each marker individually and in combination. In addition, we evaluated marker performance by stage at diagnosis and time between blood draw and diagnosis. Results: We observed the best discrimination between cases and controls within 6 months of diagnosis for CA125 (C-statistic = 0.92), then HE4 (0.84), CA72.4 (0.77), and CA15.3 (0.73). Marker performance declined with longer time between blood draw and diagnosis and for earlier staged disease. However, assessment of discriminatory ability at early stage was limited by small numbers. Combinations of markers performed modestly, but significantly better than any single marker. Conclusions: CA125 remains the single best marker for the early detection of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, but can be slightly improved by combining with other markers. Identifying novel markers for ovarian cancer will require studies including larger numbers of early-stage cases. Clin Cancer Res; 22(18); 4664–75. ©2016 AACR. See related commentary by Skates, p. 4542

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10780432
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Terry, K L, Schock, H, Fortner, R T, Hüsing, A, Fichorova, R N, Yamamoto, H S, Vitonis, A F, Johnson, T, Overvad, K, Tjønneland, A, Boutron-Ruault, M-C, Mesrine, S, Severi, G, Dossus, L, Rinaldi, S, Boeing, H, Benetou, V, Lagiou, P, Trichopoulou, A, Krogh, V, Kuhn, E, Panico, S, Bueno-de-Mesquita, H B, Onland-Moret, N C, Peeters, P H, Gram, I T, Weiderpass, E, Duell, E J, Sanchez, M-J, Ardanaz, E, Etxezarreta, N, Navarro, C, Idahl, A, Lundin, E, Jirström, K, Manjer, J, Wareham, N J, Khaw, K-T, Smith Byrne, K, Travis, R C, Gunter, M J, Merritt, M A, Riboli, E, Cramer, D & Kaaks, R 2016, ' A prospective evaluation of early detection biomarkers for ovarian cancer in the European EPIC cohort ', Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 22, no. 18, pp. 4664-75 . https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0316, Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya, instname, Clinical Cancer Research, 22(18), 4664. American Association for Cancer Research Inc., Dipòsit Digital de la UB, Universidad de Barcelona
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....dc1b53fe9cf4fb94a031ce916c6a61e2