Back to Search Start Over

Improving the breeding success of a colonial seabird: a cost-benefit comparison of the eradication and control of its rat predator

Authors :
Michel Pascal
Vincent Bretagnolle
Olivier Lorvelec
Jean-Michel Culioli
INRA
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)
Centre d'études biologiques de Chizé (CEBC)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Station commune de Recherches en Ichtyophysiologie, Biodiversité et Environnement (SCRIBE)
Source :
Endangered Species Research (4), 267-276. (2008), Endangered Species Research, Endangered Species Research, Inter-Research, 2008, 4, pp.267-276. ⟨10.3354/esr00080⟩, Endangered Species Research, Oldendorf/Luhe : Inter-Research, 2008, 4, pp.267-276. ⟨10.3354/esr00080⟩
Publication Year :
2008

Abstract

International audience; Breeding success of 5 Cory's shearwater Calonectris diomedea sub-colonies of Lavezzu Island (Lavezzi Archipelago, Corsica) was checked annually for 25 consecutive years from 1979 to 2004. Between 1989 and 1994, 4 ship rat Rattus rattus controls were performed in several subcolonies. In November 2000, rats were eradicated from Lavezzu Island and its 16 peripheral islets (85 ha) using traps then toxic baits. We compare cost (number of person-hours required in the field) and benefit (Cory's shearwater breeding success) of control and eradication. The average breeding success doubled when rats were controlled or eradicated (0.82) compared to the situation without rat management (0.45). Moreover, the average breeding success after eradication (0.86) was significantly (11%) higher than after rat controls (0.75). Furthermore, the great variation in breeding success recorded among sub-colonies both with and without rat control declined dramatically after eradication, suggesting that rats had a major impact on breeding success. The estimated effort needed to perform eradication and checking of the permanent bait-station system during the year following eradication was 1360 person-hours. In contrast, rat control was estimated to require 240 or 1440 person-hours per year when implemented by trained and untrained staff, respectively. Within 6 yr, eradication cost is lower than control cost performed by untrained staff and confers several ecological advantages on more ecosystem components than Cory's shearwater alone. Improved eradication tools such as hand or aerial broadcasting of toxic baits instead of the fairly labour-intensive eradication strategy we used would dramatically increase the economic advantage of eradication vs. control. Therefore, when feasible, we recommend eradication rather than control of non-native rat populations. Nevertheless, control remains a useful management tool when eradication is not practicable

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18635407 and 16134796
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Endangered Species Research (4), 267-276. (2008), Endangered Species Research, Endangered Species Research, Inter-Research, 2008, 4, pp.267-276. ⟨10.3354/esr00080⟩, Endangered Species Research, Oldendorf/Luhe : Inter-Research, 2008, 4, pp.267-276. ⟨10.3354/esr00080⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....db9cdae69e18dd6325109a6049fc2186
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00080⟩