Back to Search Start Over

Mechanistic Differences in the Activation of Estrogen Receptor-α (ERα)- and ERβ-dependent Gene Expression by cAMP Signaling Pathway(s)

Authors :
Brian G. Rowan
Abeer El-Gharbawy
Nancy L. Weigel
Kevin M. Coleman
Martin Dutertre
Carolyn L. Smith
Source :
Journal of Biological Chemistry. 278:12834-12845
Publication Year :
2003
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2003.

Abstract

Although increases in intracellular cAMP can stimulate estrogen receptor-alpha (ER alpha) activity in the absence of exogenous hormone, no studies have addressed whether ER beta can be similarly regulated. In transient transfections, forskolin plus 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX), which increases intracellular cAMP, stimulated the transcriptional activities of both ER alpha and ER beta. This effect was blocked by the protein kinase A inhibitor H89 (N-(2-(p-bromocinnamylamino)-ethyl)-5-isoquinolinesulfonamide) and was dependent on an estrogen response element. A 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate response element (TRE) located 5' to the estrogen response element was necessary for cAMP-dependent activation of gene expression by ER beta but not ER alpha, indicating that the former subtype requires a functional interaction with TRE-interacting factor(s) to stimulate transcription. Both p160 and CREB-binding protein coactivators stimulated cAMP-induced ER alpha and ER beta transcriptional activity. However, mutation of the two cAMP-inducible SRC-1 phosphorylation sites important for cAMP activation of chicken progesterone receptor or all seven known SRC-1 phosphorylation sites did not specifically impair cAMP activation of ER alpha. The E/F domains of ER alpha are sufficient for activation by forskolin/IBMX, and this is accompanied by an increase in receptor phosphorylation. In contrast, cAMP signaling reduces the phosphorylation of the corresponding region of ER beta, and this correlates with the lack of forskolin/IBMX stimulated transcriptional activity. Our data suggest that cAMP activation of ER alpha transcriptional activity is associated with receptor instead of SRC-1 phosphorylation. Moreover, differences in the cofactor requirements, domains of ER alpha and ER beta sufficient for forskolin/IBMX activation, and the effect of cAMP on receptor phosphorylation indicate that this signaling pathway utilizes distinct mechanisms to stimulate ER alpha and ER beta transcriptional activity.

Details

ISSN :
00219258
Volume :
278
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....db90e0c5568fae6f5e5d380fcb7d85d9
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m212312200