Back to Search Start Over

Bone visualization of the cervical spine with deep learning-based synthetic CT compared to conventional CT: A single-center noninferiority study on image quality

Authors :
Brigitta Britt Y M, van der Kolk
Derk J Jorik, Slotman
Ingrid M, Nijholt
Jochen A C, van Osch
Tess J, Snoeijink
Martin, Podlogar
Boudewijn A A M, van Hasselt
Henk J, Boelhouwers
Marijn, van Stralen
Peter R, Seevinck
Niels W L, Schep
Mario, Maas
Martijn F, Boomsma
Radiology and nuclear medicine
Source :
European Journal of Radiology, 154:110414. Elsevier Ireland Ltd, van der Kolk, B Y M, Slotman, D J, Nijholt, I M, van Osch, J A C, Snoeijink, T J, Podlogar, M, van Hasselt, B A A M, Boelhouwers, H J, van Stralen, M, Seevinck, P R, Schep, N W L, Maas, M & Boomsma, M F 2022, ' Bone visualization of the cervical spine with deep learning-based synthetic CT compared to conventional CT : A single-center noninferiority study on image quality ', European Journal of Radiology, vol. 154, 110414 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110414
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2022.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate whether the image quality of a specific deep learning-based synthetic CT (sCT) of the cervical spine is noninferior to conventional CT. Method: Paired MRI and CT data were collected from 25 consecutive participants (≥ 50 years) with cervical radiculopathy. The MRI exam included a T1-weighted multiple gradient echo sequence for sCT reconstruction. For qualitative image assessment, four structures at two vertebral levels were evaluated on sCT and compared with CT by three assessors using a four-point scale (range 1–4). The noninferiority margin was set at 0.5 point on this scale. Additionally, acceptable image quality was defined as a score of 3–4 in ≥ 80% of the scans. Quantitative assessment included geometrical analysis and voxelwise comparisons. Results: Qualitative image assessment showed that sCT was noninferior to CT for overall bone image quality, artifacts, imaging of intervertebral joints and neural foramina at levels C3-C4 and C6-C7, and cortical delineation at C6-C7. Noninferiority was weak to absent for cortical delineation at level C3-C4 and trabecular bone at both levels. Acceptable image quality was achieved for all structures in sCT and CT, except for trabecular bone in sCT and level C6-C7 in CT. Geometrical analysis of the sCT showed good to excellent agreement with CT. Voxelwise comparisons showed a mean absolute error of 80.05 (±6.12) HU, dice similarity coefficient (cortical bone) of 0.84 (±0.04) and structural similarity index of 0.86 (±0.02). Conclusions: This deep learning-based sCT was noninferior to conventional CT for the general visualization of bony structures of the cervical spine, artifacts, and most detailed structure assessments.

Details

ISSN :
0720048X
Volume :
154
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European Journal of Radiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d9ff91100dd1a561d14daa4ce4f39bad
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110414