Back to Search Start Over

Impact of the Everolimus-Eluting Stent on Stent Thrombosis

Authors :
Michael C. Kim
Roxana Mehran
Jason C. Kovacic
Jung Won Suh
Samin K. Sharma
George Dangas
Jose Wiley
Hyo-Soo Kim
Antoinette de Waha
Prakash Krishnan
Adnan Kastrati
Pedro R. Moreno
Somjot S Brar
Javed Suleman
Seung-Jung Park
Usman Baber
Jennifer Yu
Annapoorna Kini
Joseph Sweeny
Robert Pyo
Source :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 58(15):1569-1577
Publication Year :
2011
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2011.

Abstract

Objectives We evaluated the impact of the everolimus-eluting stent (EES) on the frequency of stent thrombosis (ST), target vessel revascularization (TVR), myocardial infarction (MI), and cardiac death in randomized controlled trials comparing the EES to non–everolimus-eluting drug-eluting stents (EE-DES). Background Whether or not the unique properties of the EES translate into reductions in ST remains unknown. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and Internet sources for articles comparing outcomes between EES and non–EE-DES without language or date restriction. Randomized controlled trials reporting the frequency of ST were included. Variables relating to patient and study characteristics and clinical endpoints were extracted. Results We identified 13 randomized trials (n = 17,101) with a weighted mean follow-up of 21.7 months. Compared with non–EE-DES, the EES significantly reduced ST (relative risk [RR]: 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38 to 0.78; p = 0.001), TVR (RR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.64 to 0.92; p = 0.004), and MI (RR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.64 to 0.96; p = 0.02). There was no difference in cardiac mortality between the groups (RR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.74 to 1.16; p = 0.38). The treatment effect was consistent by different follow-up times and duration of clopidogrel use. The treatment effects increased with higher baseline risks of the respective control groups with the strongest correlation observed for ST (R 2 = 0.89, p Conclusions Intracoronary implantation of the EES is associated with highly significant reductions in ST with concordant reductions in TVR and MI compared to non–EE-DES. Whether these effects apply to different patient subgroups and DES types merits further investigation.

Details

ISSN :
07351097
Volume :
58
Issue :
15
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d9fb36604ce40ff079a7dd9142f68821
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.049