Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of Recent Practice Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis

Authors :
Kosmas I. Paraskevas
Dimitri P. Mikhailidis
Pier Luigi Antignani
Enrico Ascher
Hediyeh Baradaran
Reinoud P.H. Bokkers
Richard P. Cambria
Anthony J. Comerota
Alan Dardik
Alun H. Davies
Hans-Henning Eckstein
Gianluca Faggioli
Jose Fernandes e Fernandes
Gustav Fraedrich
George Geroulakos
Peter Gloviczki
Jonathan Golledge
Ajay Gupta
Mateja K. Jezovnik
Stavros K. Kakkos
Niki Katsiki
Michael Knoflach
M. Eline Kooi
Gaetano Lanza
George S. Lavenson
Christos D. Liapis
Ian M. Loftus
Armando Mansilha
Antoine Millon
Andrew N. Nicolaides
Rodolfo Pini
Pavel Poredos
Robert M. Proczka
Jean-Baptiste Ricco
Thomas S. Riles
Peter Arthur Ringleb
Tatjana Rundek
Luca Saba
Felix Schlachetzki
Mauro Silvestrini
Francesco Spinelli
Francesco Stilo
Sherif Sultan
Jasjit S. Suri
Alexei V. Svetlikov
Clark J. Zeebregts
Seemant Chaturvedi
Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa
Source :
Angiology. 73(10)
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

© The Author(s) 2022. Sage Publications<br />Despite the publication of several national/international guidelines, the optimal management of patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis (AsxCS) remains controversial. This article compares 3 recently released guidelines (the 2020 German-Austrian, the 2021 European Stroke Organization [ESO], and the 2021 Society for Vascular Surgery [SVS] guidelines) vs the 2017 European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) guidelines regarding the optimal management of AsxCS patients.The 2017 ESVS guidelines defined specific imaging/clinical parameters that may identify patient subgroups at high future stroke risk and recommended that carotid endarterectomy (CEA) should or carotid artery stenting (CAS) may be considered for these individuals. The 2020 German-Austrian guidelines provided similar recommendations with the 2017 ESVS Guidelines. The 2021 ESO Guidelines also recommended CEA for AsxCS patients at high risk for stroke on best medical treatment (BMT), but recommended against routine use of CAS in these patients. Finally, the SVS guidelines provided a strong recommendation for CEA+BMT vs BMT alone for low-surgical risk patients with >70% AsxCS. Thus, the ESVS, German-Austrian, and ESO guidelines concurred that all AsxCS patients should receive risk factor modification and BMT, but CEA should or CAS may also be considered for certain AsxCS patient subgroups at high risk for future ipsilateral ischemic stroke.

Details

ISSN :
19401574
Volume :
73
Issue :
10
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Angiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d9e54e6c38173b9d5192d66855255e3d