Back to Search
Start Over
Extended Thromboprophylaxis with Betrixaban in Acutely Ill Medical Patients
- Source :
- Dipòsit Digital de la UB, Universidad de Barcelona, New England Journal of Medicine, New England Journal of Medicine, Massachusetts Medical Society, 2016, 375 (6), pp.534-544. ⟨10.1056/NEJMoa1601747⟩
- Publication Year :
- 2016
- Publisher :
- Massachusetts Medical Society, 2016.
-
Abstract
- Background\ud Patients with acute medical illnesses are at prolonged risk for venous thrombosis. However, the appropriate duration of thromboprophylaxis remains unknown.\ud \ud Methods\ud Patients who were hospitalized for acute medical illnesses were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous enoxaparin (at a dose of 40 mg once daily) for 10±4 days plus oral betrixaban placebo for 35 to 42 days or subcutaneous enoxaparin placebo for 10±4 days plus oral betrixaban (at a dose of 80 mg once daily) for 35 to 42 days. We performed sequential analyses in three prespecified, progressively inclusive cohorts: patients with an elevated d-dimer level (cohort 1), patients with an elevated d-dimer level or an age of at least 75 years (cohort 2), and all the enrolled patients (overall population cohort). The statistical analysis plan specified that if the between-group difference in any analysis in this sequence was not significant, the other analyses would be considered exploratory. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of asymptomatic proximal deep-vein thrombosis and symptomatic venous thromboembolism. The principal safety outcome was major bleeding.\ud \ud Results\ud A total of 7513 patients underwent randomization. In cohort 1, the primary efficacy outcome occurred in 6.9% of patients receiving betrixaban and 8.5% receiving enoxaparin (relative risk in the betrixaban group, 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65 to 1.00; P=0.054). The rates were 5.6% and 7.1%, respectively (relative risk, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.98; P=0.03) in cohort 2 and 5.3% and 7.0% (relative risk, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.92; P=0.006) in the overall population. (The last two analyses were considered to be exploratory owing to the result in cohort 1.) In the overall population, major bleeding occurred in 0.7% of the betrixaban group and 0.6% of the enoxaparin group (relative risk, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.67 to 2.12; P=0.55).\ud \ud Conclusions\ud Among acutely ill medical patients with an elevated d-dimer level, there was no significant difference between extended-duration betrixaban and a standard regimen of enoxaparin in the prespecified primary efficacy outcome. However, prespecified exploratory analyses provided evidence suggesting a benefit for betrixaban in the two larger cohorts. (Funded by Portola Pharmaceuticals; APEX ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01583218. opens in new tab.)
- Subjects :
- Male
Pyridines
Medizin
030204 cardiovascular system & hematology
law.invention
chemistry.chemical_compound
0302 clinical medicine
Randomized controlled trial
Risk Factors
law
030212 general & internal medicine
ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS
Ultrasonography
Venous Thrombosis
Factors de risc en les malalties
Medicine (all)
Acute Disease
Adult
Aged
Benzamides
Double-Blind Method
Drug Administration Schedule
Factor Xa Inhibitors
Female
Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products
Hemorrhage
Hospitalization
Humans
Middle Aged
Pulmonary Embolism
Venous Thromboembolism
General Medicine
3. Good health
Pulmonary embolism
Venous thrombosis
Cohort
medicine.medical_specialty
Patients
Risk factors in diseases
Placebo
03 medical and health sciences
[SDV.MHEP.CSC]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Cardiology and cardiovascular system
Internal medicine
Thromboembolism
medicine
Pacients
Betrixaban
Thromboprophylaxis
Acutely Ill Medical Patients
Tromboembolisme
business.industry
Settore MED/09 - MEDICINA INTERNA
ta3121
Population cohort
medicine.disease
Surgery
chemistry
Once daily
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 00284793 and 15334406
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Dipòsit Digital de la UB, Universidad de Barcelona, New England Journal of Medicine, New England Journal of Medicine, Massachusetts Medical Society, 2016, 375 (6), pp.534-544. ⟨10.1056/NEJMoa1601747⟩
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....d9dea9bcc82ec589cf4e333e48685d35
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1601747⟩