Update of Operative Log Data for Traditional versus Integrated Vascular Training Programs

Background In 2006, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) approved an integrated 5-year vascular surgery residency program creating a 2-tiered system of training for vascular surgeons. The question remains if the new paradigm is equivalent to the traditional training. The true test of this may be looking at data from fully trained surgeons in their first years of practice. It is hard to obtain this data. There are surrogate methods that can be used. Operative experience of trainees is readily available as a substitute. The purpose of this study is to compare the operative experience of those graduating from the traditional (5 + 2) vascular training program with the integrated (0 + 5) program. Methods National operative case log data supplied by the ACGME was gathered and organized for vascular surgery residents graduating between 2013 and 2019. Mean case numbers were compared between integrated vascular residents and traditional vascular fellows (mean case numbers for vascular fellows included cases from their general surgery residencies). Results The 5 + 2 trainees performed an average of 35% more total procedures than the 0 + 5 trainees (1,662 ± 7 vs. 1,084 ± 12). The greater number of overall procedures performed by the 5 + 2 trainees was primarily realized by an increased number of abdominal (e.g., biliary, small/large intestine) cases. However, the 0 + 5 trainees performed 8% more vascular procedures (858 ± 10 vs. 794 ± 3). The greater number of vascular procedures performed by the 0 + 5 trainees was primarily realized by increased mean numbers of endovascular and venous procedure cases. Conclusions The integrated 0 + 5 graduates performed more total vascular procedures than their 5 + 2 counterparts. The overall total operative experience remains greater for the traditional 5 + 2 graduates, given their additional 2 years of training. Further longitudinal studies will be needed to fully assess the effect of the newer integrated 0 + 5 training paradigm.