Back to Search Start Over

Evidence of pain, stress, and fear of humans during tail docking and the next four weeks in piglets (Sus scrofa domesticus)

Authors :
Sabine Herlemont
Armelle Prunier
Céline Tallet
Marine Rakotomahandry
Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l'Animal et les Systèmes d'Elevage [Rennes] (PEGASE)
AGROCAMPUS OUEST-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)
ERANET FAREWELLDOCK
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-AGROCAMPUS OUEST
Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)
Source :
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, Frontiers in Veterinary Science, Frontiers Media, 2019, 6, ⟨10.3389/fvets.2019.00462⟩, Frontiers in Veterinary Science, Vol 6 (2019), Frontiers in Veterinary Science (6), . (2019)
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2019.

Abstract

Tail docking is widely performed in pig farms to prevent tail biting. We investigated the consequences of this practice on behavioral indicators of pain and stress, and on the human-piglet relationship during lactation. Within 19 litters, piglets (1–3 days of age) were submitted on day 0 (D0) to docking with a cautery iron (D), sham-docking (S), or no docking (U). Piglets from the D and S groups were observed during the procedure (body movements and vocalizations) and just after, in isolation, during 20 s for body, tail and ear postures as well as ear movements. Piglets from the three treatments were observed in their home pen after docking on D0 and D3 afternoon for body posture, tail posture and movements. Piglets from the D and U groups were observed on D6, D12, D19, and D26 in their home pen for oral behavior, body, and tail posture. Tail damage and tear staining were scored on D5, D11, D18, and D25. A 5-min motionless human test was performed on D14. During the procedure, D piglets screamed more and with a higher intensity (P < 0.05) than S piglets (n = 48–50). Just after docking, D piglets held their ears in a posture perpendicular to the head-tail axis and changed their ear posture more often (P < 0.05). Between D6 and D26, D piglets kept their tail immobile (P < 0.001) and in a horizontal position (P < 0.01) more often than U piglets (n = 45–47). Between D11 and D25, U piglets had higher scores for tail damage and damage freshness than D piglets (0.09 < P < 0.02) whereas tear-stain score was similar. In the human test, D piglets interacted later with an unfamiliar human than U piglets (P = 0.01, n = 18/group). Present data indicate signs of acute pain and stress in piglets due to docking during the procedure itself and adverse consequences throughout lactation thereafter, including on their relationship with humans. On the other hand, the presence of tail lesions shows that undocked piglets are subject to more tail biting, even before weaning.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
22971769
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, Frontiers in Veterinary Science, Frontiers Media, 2019, 6, ⟨10.3389/fvets.2019.00462⟩, Frontiers in Veterinary Science, Vol 6 (2019), Frontiers in Veterinary Science (6), . (2019)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d98969e66fa77cb595f7f1c75050624f
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00462⟩