Beyond the local marriage market

This study examines whether the increase of geographical heterogamy in the nineteenth and early twentieth century is related to modernization. Specifically, we test whether mass communication and mass transport enhanced the likelihood of a geographically heterogamous marriage as well as the distance over which heterogamous marriages took place. Furthermore, we study whether modernization decreased the relationship between social background and geographical heterogamy. We employ individual and municipality level data of some 30,000 marriages in over 40 municipalities in the Dutch province Overijssel between 1823 and 1922. The results from our multi-level analyses suggest that mass communication was more important than mass transport. 1. Introduction Studies of geographical heterogamy in Europe and the United States in the nineteenth and twentieth century show a strong tendency for people to marry someone living nearby (e.g. Bossard 1932; Rogoff Ramsoy 1966; Van Poppel & Ekamper 2005). For example, of all marriages in the first five months of 1931 in the city of Philadelphia, 30% of the couples lived one block or less apart just before marriage, and only 18 % of the couples had one partner coming from outside the city (Bossard 1932). Most studies show that during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries the size of the marriage market increased (Gueresi, Pettener, and Maruzzi Veronesi 2001; Kok and Mandemakers 2008; Van Poppel and Ekamper 2005; but see Kok 1998 and Van de Putte 2003 for exceptions). Geographical heterogamy increased and shows the same development as heterogamy with respect to other ascribed characteristics, such as class of origin and religion (the latter after 1938) (Hendrickx, Lammers and Ultee 1991; Uunk 1996; Zijdeman and Maas forthcoming). But note that age heterogamy decreased during this period (e.g. Van Poppel et al. 2001). Contrary to studies on heterogamy with respect to age, class of origin, and religion, studies on geographical heterogamy are relatively scarce. However studying geographical heterogamy is highly relevant because it is connected to social cohesion in society. If culture or economic prosperity strongly differs between local entities, this is a potential source of conflict. The likelihood of conflict is less if there is exchange of people between localities, either by migration or by marriage. At the same time, as a consequence of the exchange of people, cultural and economic differences diminish. In the nineteenth century differences between regions in the Netherlands were still strong. Protestants lived in the north and Catholics in the south of the country. Between small regions there were differences in manner of speech as well as manner of dress. Municipalities even differed in their measurement of time, although the use of a universal time was requested by the Dutch government (Knippenberg and De Pater 1988: 77-82). Couples from different geographical backgrounds had to deal with these differences and solve the potential local conflicts. Today the cultural and economic differences between local entities in the Netherlands are small, although still existent. By uncovering the causes of increased geographical heterogamy we may come to understand how local differences were overcome. In an attempt to provide an explanation for the increase in heterogamy, with respect to ascribed characteristics in general and geographical heterogamy specifically, researchers refer to the modernization processes, such as the development of new means of mass transport and the appearance of mass communication (Kok and Mandemakers 2008; Van Poppel and Ekamper 2005; Uunk 1996; Zijdeman and Maas forthcoming). These two aspects of modernization affect heterogamy through different mechanisms. Means of mass transport allow people to travel over larger distances and increase the likelihood of finding a partner outside the local region. Mass communication is thought to spread information, such as news on events, technological developments, and fashion, beyond local regions. …