Back to Search Start Over

Return-to-Play and Rehabilitation Protocols Following Isolated Meniscal Repair—A Systematic Review

Authors :
Eoghan T. Hurley
Laith M. Jazrawi
Kirk A. Campbell
Eric J. Strauss
Amit K. Manjunath
Jordan W. Fried
Source :
Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation, Vol 3, Iss 1, Pp e241-e247 (2021), Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2021.

Abstract

Purpose To systematically review the literature and assess the reported rehabilitation protocols, return-to-play guidelines, and reported rates of return-to-play after meniscal repair. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to identify studies on meniscal repair. Studies were included if return-to-play data and/or rehabilitation protocols were reported. The rate and timing of return-to-play was assessed. The rehabilitation protocols were documented, in addition to when to start range of motion (ROM), full ROM, partial weight-bearing (WB), and full WB. Results Overall, 88 studies met our inclusion criteria. Thirteen studies, including 507 patients, cited a range of 71.2% to 100% of return-to-play, with 53.9% to 92.6% returning to the same/greater level, ranging between 3.3 and 10 months. There was considerable variability in the reported rehabilitation protocols, but the most frequently reported time to begin ROM exercises was within the first week (78.9%) and full ROM at 6 weeks (33.3%). Partial WB was typically begun during the first week (61.0%), and full WB between the fourth and sixth week (65.6%) postoperatively. Following surgery, time elapsed was the most commonly cited criteria for return-to-play (97.0%), with 6 months being the most common time point applied (46.9%). No study advised against returning to competitive or contact sports after meniscal repair. Conclusions In conclusion, there was a high rate of return-to-play following meniscal repair, with 60% of patients returning to the same level of play. However, there was considerable diversity in the reported rehabilitation protocols and insufficient reporting on return-to-play criteria in the literature. This demonstrates the need for further research and formulation of an evidence-based consensus statement for this patient population. Level of Evidence Level IV, systematic review of Level I to IV studies.

Details

Language :
English
Volume :
3
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d8c94f4886f946358151da9052fcc8a4