Back to Search Start Over

Distribution of Salmonella in swine herds in Québec

Authors :
Sylvain Quessy
Ann Letellier
J. Paré
Serge Messier
J. Ménard
Source :
Veterinary Microbiology. 67:299-306
Publication Year :
1999
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 1999.

Abstract

Five porcine finishing units, previously identified as contaminated by Salmonella, were sampled to identify possible sources of contamination and to study the distribution of Salmonella within the herds. A total of 208 environmental samples were taken and 87 samples (42%) were found contaminated by Salmonella spp. Salmonella was recovered from several types of samples. Among these, fecal material from pens, building environment such as doors, floors, ventilation units, dust and farm accessories were most often found positive. Some of the flies and rodents were also positive. Two of the finishing units were part of an integrated production system and the prevalence and distribution of Salmonella spp. at different production steps of the integrated facilities were studied. Forty-one farms were sampled and a total of 1923 faecal samples in randomly selected pens were analysed. One hundred and fifty-one samples (7.9%) were positive for Salmonella spp. Among the farms sampled, 70.7% (29/41) were positive for isolation of Salmonella. The different levels in the integrated production were unevenly contaminated. Replacement sow (15.9%) and finishing unit for gilts (21.9%) were the most contaminated levels. Ten serotypes of Salmonella (n = 132) were identified in the production pyramid with a predominance of Salmonella Derby (37.1%) and Salmonella Typhimurium (34.1%). Pulse Field Gel Electrophoresis analysis of the various isolates from serotypes and Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Derby and Salmonella Anatum showed no variation in the genetic profiles, within each serotype, suggesting a vertical contamination throughout the different production steps.

Details

ISSN :
03781135
Volume :
67
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Veterinary Microbiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d8a5beb3961fb60f3be53cca7da46580
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1135(99)00049-8