Back to Search Start Over

Genomic investigation of milk production in Italian buffalo

Authors :
Stefano Biffani
Ignacy Misztal
Daniela Lourenco
Alberto Cesarani
Nicolò Pietro Paolo Macciotta
Gianluca Neglia
Andre Garcia
Giacomo Bertolini
Cesarani, A.
Biffani, S.
Garcia, A.
Lourenco, D.
Bertolini, G.
Neglia, G.
Misztal, I.
Macciotta, N. P. P.
Source :
Italian Journal of Animal Science, Vol 20, Iss 1, Pp 539-547 (2021), Italian Journal of Animal Science (Online) 20 (2021): 539–547. doi:10.1080/1828051X.2021.1902404, info:cnr-pdr/source/autori:Alberto Cesarani and Stefano Biffani and Andre Garcia and Daniela Lourenco and Giacomo Bertolini and Gianluca Neglia and Ignacy Misztal and Nicolo Pietro Paolo Macciotta/titolo:Genomic investigation of milk production in Italian buffalo/doi:10.1080%2F1828051X.2021.1902404/rivista:Italian Journal of Animal Science (Online)/anno:2021/pagina_da:539/pagina_a:547/intervallo_pagine:539–547/volume:20
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Informa UK Limited, 2021.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of genomic selection in the Italian Mediterranean water buffalo, which is farmed mainly in the south Italy for milk, and mozzarella, production. A total of 498 animals were genotyped at 49,164 loci. Test day records (80,417) of milk (MY), fat (FY) and protein (PY) yields from 4127 cows, born between 1975 and 2009, were analysed in a three-trait model. Cows born in 2008 and 2009 with phenotypes and genotypes were selected as validation animals (n = 50). Variance components (VC) were estimated with BLUP and ssGBLUP. Heritabilities for BLUP were 0.25 ? 0.02 (MY), 0.16 ? 0.01 (FY) and 0.25 ? 0.01 (PY). Breeding values were computed using BLUP and ssGBLUP, using VC estimated from BLUP. ssGBLUP was applied in five scenarios, each with a different number of genotypes available: (A) bulls (35); (B) validation cows (50); (C) bulls and validation cows (85); (D) all genotyped cows (463); (E) all genotypes (498). Model validation was performed using the LR method: correlation, accuracy, dispersion, and bias statistics were calculated. Average correlations were 0.71 ? 0.02 and 0.82 ? 0.01 for BLUP and ssGBLUP-E, respectively. Accuracies were also higher in ssGBLUP-E (0.75 ? 0.03) compared to BLUP (0.57 ? 0.03). The best dispersions (i.e. closer to 1) were found for ssGBLUP-C. The use of genotypes only for the 35 bulls did not change the validation values compared to BLUP. Results of the present study, even if based on small number of animals, showed that the inclusion of genotypes of females can improve breeding values accuracy in the Italian Buffalo.HighlightsThe genotypes of males did not improve the predictions.Genotypes of females improve breeding values accuracy.Slight increase in prediction accuracy with weighted ssGBLUP.

Details

ISSN :
1828051X
Volume :
20
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Italian Journal of Animal Science
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d822642013bc2afee30f2091a0a0ac44