Back to Search Start Over

Patient preferences for maintenance PARP inhibitor therapy in ovarian cancer treatment

Authors :
Angeles Alvarez Secord
Juan Marcos Gonzalez
F. Reed Johnson
Shelby D. Reed
Jessie Ehrisman
Stephanie Lim
Jui-Chen Yang
Laura J. Havrilesky
Amelia Lorenzo
Source :
Gynecologic Oncology. 156:561-567
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2020.

Abstract

Objective To measure preferences of women with ovarian cancer regarding risks, side effects, costs and benefits afforded by maintenance therapy (MT) with a poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor. Methods A discrete-choice experiment elicited preferences of women with ovarian cancer regarding 6 attributes (levels in parentheses) relevant to decisions for MT versus treatment break: (1) overall survival (OS; 36, 38, 42 months); (2) progression-free survival (PFS; 15, 17, 21 months); (3) nausea (none, mild, moderate); (4) fatigue (none, mild, moderate); (5) probability of death from myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myelogenous leukemia (MDS/AML; 0% to 10%); (6) monthly out-of-pocket cost ($0 to $1000). Participants chose between 2 variable MT scenarios and a static scenario representing treatment break, with multiple iterations. Random-parameters logit regression was applied to model choices as a function of attribute levels. Results 95 eligible participants completed the survey; mean age was 62, 48% had recurrence, and 17% were ever-PARP inhibitor users. Participants valued OS (average importance weight 24.5 out of 100) and monthly costs (24.6) most highly, followed by risk of death from MDS/AML (17.9), nausea (14.7), PFS (10.5) and fatigue (7.8). Participants would accept 5% risk of MDS/AML if treatment provided 2.2 months additional OS or 4.8 months PFS. Participants would require gains of 2.6 months PFS to accept mild treatment-related fatigue and 4.4 months to accept mild nausea. Conclusions When considering MT, women with ovarian cancer are most motivated by gains in OS. Women expect at least 3–4 months of PFS benefit to bear mild side effects of treatment.

Details

ISSN :
00908258
Volume :
156
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Gynecologic Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d7db889c72b962dae6ce1e5fd94e76ba