Back to Search Start Over

Multiobjective formulation is an effective method to reduce environmental impacts of livestock feeds

Authors :
Bertrand Méda
Florence Garcia-Launay
Léonie Dusart
Sarah Laisse-Redoux
Didier Gaudré
Aurélie Wilfart
Sandrine Espagnol
Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l'Animal et les Systèmes d'Elevage [Rennes] (PEGASE)
AGROCAMPUS OUEST-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)
Institut Technique de l'Aviculture et des Elevages de Petits Animaux (ITAVI)
Institut du Porc
Institut de l'Elevage
Recherches Avicoles (SRA)
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)
Sol Agro et hydrosystème Spatialisation (SAS)
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-AGROCAMPUS OUEST
Casdar
ADEME REACCTIF-2012 1260C0061
Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)
ITAVI
Institut du Porc (IFIP)
Institut de l'élevage (IDELE)
Unité de Recherches Avicoles (URA)
Source :
British Journal of Nutrition, British Journal of Nutrition, Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2018, 120 (11), pp.1298-1309. ⟨10.1017/S0007114518002672⟩
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2018.

Abstract

Environmental and economic performances of livestock production are related largely to the production of complete feeds provided on commercial farms. Formulating feeds based on environmental and economic criteria appears a suitable approach to address the current challenges of animal production. We developed a multiobjective (MO) method of formulating feed which considers both the cost and environmental impacts (estimated via life cycle assessment) of the feed mix. In the first step, least-cost formulation provides a baseline for feed cost and potential impacts per kg of feed. In the second, the minimised MO function includes normalised values of feed cost and impacts climate change, P demand, non-renewable energy demand and land occupation. An additional factor weights the relative influence of economic and environmental objectives. The potential of the method was evaluated using two scenarios of feed formulation for pig, broiler and young bulls. Compared to baseline feeds, MO-formulated feeds had lower environmental impacts in both scenarios studied (−2 to −48 %), except for land occupation of broiler feeds, and a moderately higher cost (1–7 %). The ultimate potential for this method to mitigate environmental impacts is probably lower than this, as animal supply chains may compete for the same low-impact feed ingredients. The method developed complements other strategies, and optimising the entire animal production system should be explored in the future to substantially decrease the associated impacts.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00071145 and 14752662
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
British Journal of Nutrition, British Journal of Nutrition, Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2018, 120 (11), pp.1298-1309. ⟨10.1017/S0007114518002672⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d73ac7671e3e7c9161ccfef88a75cf90
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114518002672⟩