Back to Search Start Over

Targeted Lung Deposition From Nebulization Is Not Improved in the Lateral Decubitus Position in Healthy Volunteers

Authors :
Gregory Reychler
Giuseppe Liistro
François Jamar
Beatriz Herrero-Cortina
Marta San Miguel-Pagola
Michel Hesse
Vinciane Lecocq
Anne-Sophie Aubriot
UCL - SSS/IREC/PNEU - Pôle de Pneumologie, ORL et Dermatologie
UCL - SSS/IREC/MIRO - Pôle d'imagerie moléculaire, radiothérapie et oncologie
UCL - (SLuc) Service de pneumologie
UCL - (SLuc) Service de médecine nucléaire
UCL - (SLuc) Service de pédiatrie générale
Source :
Respiratory care, Vol. 64, no.12, p. 1537-1544 (2019)
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Daedalus Enterprises for the American Association for Respiratory Therapy, 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical benefits of inhaled therapies are related to the amount of drug deposited in the targeted area of the lung. Body positions that influence the distribution of lung ventilation should impact lung deposition of the nebulized drug. The aim of this study was to analyze the immediate effect of body position while the subject lies on his side (lateral decubitus) during nebulization on 3-dimensional total and regional lung deposition. METHODS: A randomized crossover trial was performed on healthy male volunteers without cardiovascular or pulmonary disease. A technetium-99m diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) solution (4 mL) was nebulized using an individual-controlled inhalation system in left lateral decubitus and sitting positions with a 96-h washout period (43 inspirations of 4 s [ie, drug delivered until second 3] with a tidal volume of 0.8 L and a low inspiratory flow (200 mL/s). Drug deposition was followed with the use of planar images and single-photon-emission computed tomography combined with low-resolution computed tomography. Total and regional depositions were the main outcomes. Penetration index was also considered. RESULTS: Six participants (26.8 ± 6.9 y old) were included. Total lung deposition tended to be higher in a sitting position than in a lateral decubitus position: 10.2 ± 0.9% of nominal dose (95% CI 9.1–11.3) vs 8.6 ± 1.4% of nominal dose (95% CI 6.8–10.4) (P = .09). The deposition was significantly reduced in the dependent (left) lung in the lateral decubitus position: 3.5 ± 0.7% of nominal dose (95% CI 2.6–4.3) vs 4.7 ± 0.3% of nominal dose (95% CI 4.3–5.0) (P = .03). Penetration index was only influenced by body position for the dependent (left) lung (P = .043). CONCLUSIONS: The total amount of drug delivered to the lungs during nebulization with an individual-controlled inhalation system tended to decrease when performed in the left lateral decubitus position. Moreover, contrary to the initial hypothesis, the deposition of particles in the dependent lung was not improved by the lateral decubitus position in this configuration. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT02451501.)

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Respiratory care, Vol. 64, no.12, p. 1537-1544 (2019)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d715fd96851992b5b452a3a371d73bb0