Back to Search Start Over

Brief communication: 3-D reconstruction of a collapsed rock pillar from Web-retrieved images and terrestrial lidar data – the 2005 event of the west face of the Drus (Mont Blanc massif)

Authors :
Ludovic Ravanel
Michel Jaboyedoff
Antonio Abellán
Antoine Guerin
Battista Matasci
Marc-Henri Derron
EDYTEM, Océane Giorda
Université de Lausanne (UNIL)
Scott Polar Research Institute
University of Cambridge [UK] (CAM)
Bureau d'Etudes Géologiques
BEG
Environnements, Dynamiques et Territoires de la Montagne (EDYTEM)
Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry])-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Source :
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Vol 17, Pp 1207-1220 (2017), Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Copernicus Publ. / European Geosciences Union, 2017, 17 (7), https://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/17/1207/2017/
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

In June 2005, a series of major rockfall events completely wiped out the Bonatti Pillar located in the legendary Drus west face (Mont Blanc massif, France). Terrestrial lidar scans of the west face were acquired after this event, but no pre-event point cloud is available. Thus, in order to reconstruct the volume and the shape of the collapsed blocks, a 3-D model has been built using photogrammetry (structure-from-motion (SfM) algorithms) based on 30 pictures collected on the Web. All these pictures were taken between September 2003 and May 2005. We then reconstructed the shape and volume of the fallen compartment by comparing the SfM model with terrestrial lidar data acquired in October 2005 and November 2011. The volume is calculated to 292 680 m3 (±5.6 %). This result is close to the value previously assessed by Ravanel and Deline (2008) for this same rock avalanche (265 000 ± 10 000 m3). The difference between these two estimations can be explained by the rounded shape of the volume determined by photogrammetry, which may lead to a volume overestimation. However it is not excluded that the volume calculated by Ravanel and Deline (2008) is slightly underestimated, the thickness of the blocks having been assessed manually from historical photographs.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16849981 and 15618633
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Vol 17, Pp 1207-1220 (2017), Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Copernicus Publ. / European Geosciences Union, 2017, 17 (7), https://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/17/1207/2017/
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d6f7fd2d9dc1febb204baf917d5a0148