Back to Search Start Over

Anti-drug Antibody Validation Testing and Reporting Harmonization

Authors :
Jim McNally
Szilárd Kamondi
Daniel Kramer
Honglue Shen
Vibha Jawa
Jane Ruppel
Charles S Hottenstein
Kelli R. Phillips
Meina Liang
Michael E Hodsdon
Dong Geng
Joanne Goodman
Mohsen Rajabi Ahbari
Heather Myler
Marta Starcevic Manning
Alvydas Mikulskis
William Hallett
Haoheng Yan
Adrienne Clements-Egan
Paul Chamberlain
Qiang Qu
ZhenZhen Liu
Carol Gleason
Viswanath Devanaryan
George R Gunn
Susan M. Richards
Theresa J Goletz
Troy E. Barger
Susana Liu
Lakshmi Amaravadi
Veerle Snoeck
Joao Pedras-Vasconcelos
Kathryn Lindley
Robert Nelson
Mark Ware
Shobha Purushothama
An Song
Susan Kirshner
Brian M Janelsins
Jad Zoghbi
Steven Bowen
Ronald R. Bowsher
Source :
The AAPS Journal. 24
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2021.

Abstract

Evolving immunogenicity assay performance expectations and a lack of harmonized anti-drug antibody validation testing and reporting tools have resulted in significant time spent by health authorities and sponsors on resolving filing queries. Following debate at the American Association of Pharmaceutical Sciences National Biotechnology Conference, a group was formed to address these gaps. Over the last 3 years, 44 members from 29 organizations (including 5 members from Europe and 10 members from FDA) discussed gaps in understanding immunogenicity assay requirements and have developed harmonization tools for use by industry scientists to facilitate filings to health authorities. Herein, this team provides testing and reporting strategies and tools for the following assessments: (1) pre-study validation cut point; (2) in-study cut points, including procedures for applying cut points to mixed populations; (3) system suitability control criteria for in-study plate acceptance; (4) assay sensitivity, including the selection of an appropriate low positive control; (5) specificity, including drug and target tolerance; (6) sample stability that reflects sample storage and handling conditions; (7) assay selectivity to matrix components, including hemolytic, lipemic, and disease state matrices; (8) domain specificity for multi-domain therapeutics; (9) and minimum required dilution and extraction-based sample processing for titer reporting. Graphical Abstract

Details

ISSN :
15507416
Volume :
24
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The AAPS Journal
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d6bacf181ab0fa77b1607ce8395bb2e0
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-021-00649-y