Back to Search Start Over

Identification of phenotypes in paediatric patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a latent class analysis

Authors :
Mary K Dahmer
Guangyu Yang
Min Zhang
Michael W Quasney
Anil Sapru
Heidi M Weeks
Pratik Sinha
Martha A Q Curley
Kevin L Delucchi
Carolyn S Calfee
Heidi Flori
Michael A Matthay
Scot T Bateman
Marc D Berg
Santiago Borasino
Gokul K Bysani
Allison S Cowl
Cindy D Bowens
Vincent S Faustino
Lori D Fineman
Aaron J Godshall
Eliotte L Hirshberg
Aileen L Kirby
Gwenn E McLaughlin
Shivanand S Medar
Phineas P Oren
James B Schneider
Adam J Schwarz
Thomas P Shanley
Lauren R Source
Edward J Truemper
Michele A Vender Heyden
Kimberly Wittmayer
Athena F Zuppa
David Wypij
Source :
Lancet Respir Med
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2022.

Abstract

Previous latent class analysis of adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) identified two phenotypes, distinguished by the degree of inflammation. We aimed to identify phenotypes in children with ARDS in whom developmental differences might be important, using a latent class analysis approach similar to that used in adults.This study was a secondary analysis of data aggregated from the Randomized Evaluation of Sedation Titration for Respiratory Failure (RESTORE) clinical trial and the Genetic Variation and Biomarkers in Children with Acute Lung Injury (BALI) ancillary study. We used latent class analysis, which included demographic, clinical, and plasma biomarker variables, to identify paediatric ARDS (PARDS) phenotypes within a cohort of children included in the RESTORE and BALI studies. The association of phenotypes with clinically relevant outcomes and the performance of paediatric data in adult ARDS classification algorithms were also assessed.304 children with PARDS were included in this secondary analysis. Using latent class analysis, a two-class model was a better fit for the cohort than a one-class model (p0·001). Latent class analysis identified two classes: class 1 (181 [60%] of 304 patients with PARDS) and class 2 (123 [40%] of 304 patients with PARDS), referred to as phenotype 1 and 2 hereafter. Phenotype 2 was characterised by higher concentrations of inflammatory biomarkers, a higher incidence of vasopressor use, and more frequent diagnosis of sepsis, consistent with the adult hyperinflammatory phenotype. All levels of severity of PARDS were observed across both phenotypes. Children with the hyperinflammatory phenotype (phenotype 2) had worse clinical outcomes than those with the hypoinflammatory phenotype (phenotype 1), with a longer duration of mechanical ventilation (median 10·0 days [IQR 6·3-21·0] for phenotype 2 vs 6·6 days [4·1-10·8] for phenotype 1, p0·0001), and higher incidence of mortality (17 [13·8%] of 123 patients vs four [2·2%] of 181 patients, p=0·0001). When using adult phenotype classification algorithms in children, the soluble tumour necrosis factor receptor-1 (sTNFr1), vasopressor use, and interleukin (IL)-6 variables gave an area under the curve (AUC) of 0·956, and the sTNFr1, vasopressor use, and IL-8 variables gave an AUC of 0·954, compared with the gold standard of latent class analysis.Latent class analysis identified two phenotypes in children with ARDS with characteristics similar to those in adults, including worse outcomes among patients with the hyperinflammatory phenotype. PARDS phenotypes should be considered in design and analysis of future clinical trials in children.US National Institutes of Health.

Details

ISSN :
22132600
Volume :
10
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d61437012754e24949aa17f7c99ea4dd
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(21)00382-9