Back to Search Start Over

The ebb and flow of attention: Between-subject variation in intrinsic connectivity and cognition associated with the dynamics of ongoing experience

Authors :
Kernbach, Julius
Yeo, B.
Thiebaut De Schotten, Michel
Walter, Henrik
Sabuncu, Mert
Holmes, Avram
Gramfort, Alexandre
Varoquaux, Gaël
Thirion, Bertrand
Bzdok, Danilo
Milham, Michael
Ai, Lei
Koo, Bonhwang
Xu, Ting
Amiez, Céline
Balezeau, Fabien
Baxter, Mark
Blezer, Erwin L.A.
Brochier, Thomas
Chen, Aihua
Croxson, Paula
Damatac, Christienne
Dehaene, Stanislas
Everling, Stefan
Fair, Damian
Fleysher, Lazar
Freiwald, Winrich
Froudist-Walsh, Seán
Griffiths, Timothy
Guedj, Carole
Hadj-Bouziane, Fadila
Ben Hamed, Suliann
Harel, Noam
Hiba, Bassem
Jarraya, Bechir
Jung, Benjamin
Kastner, Sabine
Klink, P. Christiaan
Kwok, Sze Chai
Laland, Kevin
Leopold, David
Lindenfors, Patrik
Mars, Rogier
Menon, Ravi
Messinger, Adam
Meunier, Martine
Mok, Kelvin
Morrison, John
Nacef, Jennifer
Nagy, Jamie
Rios, Michael Ortiz
Petkov, Christopher
Pinsk, Mark
Poirier, Colline
Procyk, Emmanuel
Rajimehr, Reza
Reader, Simon
Roelfsema, Pieter
Rudko, David
Rushworth, Matthew F.S.
Russ, Brian
Sallet, Jérôme
Schmid, Michael Christoph
Schwiedrzik, Caspar
Seidlitz, Jakob
Sein, Julien
Shmuel, Amir
Sullivan, Elinor
Ungerleider, Leslie
Thiele, Alexander
Todorov, Orlin
Tsao, Doris
Wang, Zheng
Wilson, Charles R.E.
Yacoub, Essa
Ye, Frank
Zarco, Wilbert
Zhou, Yong-di
Schroeder, Charles
Turnbull, Adam
Wang, Hao-Ting
Schooler, Jonathan
Jefferies, Elizabeth
Margulies, Daniel
Smallwood, Jonathan
Department of Psychology [York, UK]
University of York [York, UK]
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences
University of California [Santa Barbara] (UC Santa Barbara)
University of California (UC)-University of California (UC)
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences [Leipzig] (IMPNSC)
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
European Project: 646927,H2020,ERC-2014-CoG,WANDERINGMINDS(2015)
Margulies, Daniel
Not all minds that wander are lost: A neurocognitive test of mind-wandering state’s contribution to human cognition. - WANDERINGMINDS - - H20202015-12-01 - 2020-05-31 - 646927 - VALID
Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen (RWTH)
Natbrainlab, Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences
Institute of psychiatry-King‘s College London
Berlin School of Mind and Brain [Berlin]
Humboldt Universität zu Berlin
Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory [Cambridge] (CSAIL)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
Harvard University [Cambridge]
Modelling brain structure, function and variability based on high-field MRI data (PARIETAL)
Service NEUROSPIN (NEUROSPIN)
Direction de Recherche Fondamentale (CEA) (DRF (CEA))
Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Direction de Recherche Fondamentale (CEA) (DRF (CEA))
Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Inria Saclay - Ile de France
Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)
Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics [Aachen]
Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (NKI)
New York State Office of Mental Health
Child Mind Institute
Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Mat Sci & Engn
Univ Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Inserm, Stem Cell and Brain Research Institute U1208, Bron, France
Laboratoire Traitement du Signal et de l'Image (LTSI)
Université de Rennes 1 (UR1)
Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai [New York] (MSSM)
University Medical Center [Utrecht]
Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone (INT)
Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
East China Normal University [Shangaï] (ECNU)
Radboud university [Nijmegen]
Institut d'Imagerie BioMédicale (I2BM)
Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université Paris-Saclay
The University of Western Ontario
Oregon Health and Science University [Portland] (OHSU)
The Rockefeller University
Cognition and Brain Plasticity Unit
Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge [Barcelone] (IDIBELL)
Equipe Impact, Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292
Centre de recherche en neurosciences de Lyon (CRNL)
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL)
Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Université Jean Monnet [Saint-Étienne] (UJM)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Institut des sciences cognitives Marc Jeannerod - Centre de neuroscience cognitive - UMR5229 (CNC)
Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Center for Magnetic Resonance Research [Minneapolis] (CMRR)
University of Minnesota Medical School
University of Minnesota System-University of Minnesota System
ANIMAGE
Rhône-Alpes Genopole
Université de Lorraine (UL)
Princeton Neuroscience Institute [Princeton]
Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW)
University of St Andrews [Scotland]
Stockholm University
University of Pennsylvania [Philadelphia]
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
National Institute of Health
Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12 (UPEC UP12)
McConnell Brain Imaging Centre (MNI)
Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
McGill University-McGill University
Hôpital du Bocage
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon - Hôpital François Mitterrand (CHU Dijon)
Newcastle University [Newcastle]
Princeton University
Neural Rehabilitation Engineering Laboratory
Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL)
Institut cellule souche et cerveau / Stem Cell and Brain Research Institute (SBRI)
Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)
McGovern Institute for Brain Research [Cambridge]
Utrecht University [Utrecht]
Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience
Wellcome Trust Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN - FMRIB)
University of Oxford [Oxford]
Laboratoire de Chimie - UMR5182 (LC)
École normale supérieure - Lyon (ENS Lyon)-Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL)
Oregon National Primate Research Center (ONPRC)
California Institute of Technology (CALTECH)
Department of Computational and Applied Mathematics [Houston]
Rice University [Houston]
Johns Hopkins University (JHU)
Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (NKI)
Department of Psychology, The University of York, Heslington, England
Source :
NeuroImage, NeuroImage, 2019, 185 (1), pp.286-299. ⟨10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.069⟩, NeuroImage, Elsevier, 2019, 185 (1), pp.286-299. ⟨10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.069⟩
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2019.

Abstract

International audience; Cognition is dynamic, allowing us the flexibility to shift focus from different aspects of the environment, or between internally- and externally-oriented trains of thought. Although we understand how individuals switch attention across different tasks, the neurocognitive processes that underpin the dynamics of less constrained elements of cognition are less well understood. To explore this issue, we developed a paradigm in which participants intermittently responded to external events across two conditions that systematically vary in their need for updating working memory based on information in the external environment. This paradigm distinguishes the influences on cognition that emerge because of demands placed by the task (sustained) from changes that result from the time elapsed since the last task response (transient). We used experience sampling to identify dynamic changes in ongoing cognition in this paradigm, and related between subject variation in these measures to variations in the intrinsic organisation of large-scale brain networks. We found systems important for attention were involved in the regulation of off-task thought. Coupling between the ventral attention network and regions of primary motor cortex was stronger for individuals who were able to regulate off-task thought in line with the demands of the task. This pattern of coupling was linked to greater task-related thought when environmental demands were high and elevated off-task thought when demands were low. In contrast, the coupling of the dorsal attention network with a region of lateral visual cortex was stronger for individuals for whom off-task thoughts transiently increased with the time since responding to the external world increased. This pattern is consistent with a role for this system in the time-limited top-down biasing of visual processing to increase behavioural efficiency. Unlike the attention networks, coupling between regions of the default mode network and dorsal occipital cortex was weaker for individuals for whom the level of detail decreased with the passage of time when the external task did not require continuous monitoring of external information. These data provide novel evidence for how neural systems vary across subjects and may be underpin individual variation in the dynamics of thought, linking attention systems to the maintenance of task-relevant information, and the default mode network to supporting experiences with vivid detail.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10538119 and 10959572
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
NeuroImage, NeuroImage, 2019, 185 (1), pp.286-299. ⟨10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.069⟩, NeuroImage, Elsevier, 2019, 185 (1), pp.286-299. ⟨10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.069⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d4f872af0be219920e7076bf8b7d1607