Back to Search Start Over

Nomenclatural issues concerning cultured yeasts and other fungi

Authors :
Chris Todd Hittinger
Jack W. Fell
Vincent Robert
Xin-Zhan Liu
Andrey Yurkov
Vishnu Chaturvedi
Qi-Ming Wang
Matthias Sipiczki
Ferry Hagen
Masako Takashima
Serge Casaregola
Markus Kostrzewa
Marc Stadler
Hiroshi Takagi
Gábor Péter
Gianluigi Cardinali
Carlos A. Rosa
Junta Sugiyama
Kyria Boundy-Mills
José Paulo Sampaio
Benedetta Turchetti
Takashi Sugita
Feng-Yan Bai
Valérie Collin
Diego Libkind
Artur Alves
Neža Čadež
Pietro Buzzini
Aleksey V. Kachalkin
Thomas Maier
Marizeth Groenewald
Marcin Piątek
Teun Boekhout
Vassili N. Kouvelis
Victoria Girard
Wieland Meyer
Evolutionary and Population Biology (IBED, FNWI)
Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute
Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute - Collection
Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute - Medical Mycology
Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute - Software and Databasing
Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute - Yeast Research
HZI,Helmholtz-Zentrum für Infektionsforschung GmbH, Inhoffenstr. 7,38124 Braunschweig, Germany.
Source :
IMA Fungus, IMA fungus, vol 12, iss 1, IMA Fungus, 12:18. International Mycological Association, IMA Fungus, 12(1). International Mycological Association, IMA fungus, England, IMA Fungus, Vol 12, Iss 1, Pp 1-20 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

The unambiguous application of fungal names is important to communicate scientific findings. Names are critical for (clinical) diagnostics, legal compliance, and regulatory controls, such as biosafety, food security, quarantine regulations, and industrial applications. Consequently, the stability of the taxonomic system and the traceability of nomenclatural changes is crucial for a broad range of users and taxonomists. The unambiguous application of names is assured by the preservation of nomenclatural history and the physical organisms representing a name. Fungi are extremely diverse in terms of ecology, lifestyle, and methods of study. Predominantly unicellular fungi known as yeasts are usually investigated as living cultures. Methods to characterize yeasts include physiological (growth) tests and experiments to induce a sexual morph; both methods require viable cultures. Thus, the preservation and availability of viable reference cultures are important, and cultures representing reference material are cited in species descriptions. Historical surveys revealed drawbacks and inconsistencies between past practices and modern requirements as stated in the International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (ICNafp). Improper typification of yeasts is a common problem, resulting in a large number invalid yeast species names. With this opinion letter, we address the problem that culturable microorganisms, notably some fungi and algae, require specific provisions under the ICNafp. We use yeasts as a prominent example of fungi known from cultures. But viable type material is important not only for yeasts, but also for other cultivable Fungi that are characterized by particular morphological structures (a specific type of spores), growth properties, and secondary metabolites. We summarize potential proposals which, in our opinion, will improve the stability of fungal names, in particular by protecting those names for which the reference material can be traced back to the original isolate.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
22106340
Volume :
12
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
IMA Fungus
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d49b97ff083e41f2ba94a2317c832b3c