Back to Search Start Over

Effectiveness and Efficiency of Controlling Campylobacter on Broiler Chicken Meat

Authors :
Wilfrid van Pelt
Marc-Jeroen Bogaardt
Arie H. Havelaar
Aline A. De Koeijer
Jaap A. Wagenaar
Evers Eg
Maarten Nauta
Marie-Josée J. Mangen
G. Ardine de Wit
Henk van der Zee
W.F. Jacobs-Reitsma
Source :
Risk Analysis 27 (2007) 4, Risk Analysis, 27(4), 831-844
Publication Year :
2007

Abstract

Campylobacter bacteria are an important cause of foodborne infections. We estimated the potential costs and benefits of a large number of possible interventions to decrease human exposure to Campylobacter by consumption of chicken meat, which accounts for 20-40% of all cases of human campylobacteriosis in the Netherlands. For this purpose, a farm-to-fork risk assessment model was combined with economic analysis and epidemiological data. Reduction of contamination at broiler farms could be efficient in theory. However, it is unclear which hygienic measures need to be taken and the costs can be very high. The experimental treatment of colonized broiler flocks with bacteriophages has proven to be effective and could also be cost efficient, if confirmed in practice. Since a major decrease of infections at the broiler farm is not expected in the short term, additional measures in the processing plant were also considered. At this moment, guaranteed Campylobacter-free chicken meat at the retail level is not realistic. The most promising interventions in the processing plant are limiting fecal leakage during processing and separation of contaminated and noncontaminated flocks (scheduling), followed by decontamination of the contaminated flock. New (faster and more sensitive) test methods to detect Campylobacter colonization in broilers flocks are a prerequisite for successful scheduling scenarios. Other methods to decrease the contamination of meat of colonized flocks such as freezing and heat treatment are more expensive and/or less effective than chemical decontamination.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02724332
Volume :
27
Issue :
4
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Risk Analysis
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d3b183f4bdfd5c3d500b2fb063d55449