Back to Search
Start Over
Exploring approaches to identify, incorporate and report patient preferences in clinical guidelines: Qualitative interviews with guideline developers
- Source :
- Patient Education and Counseling. 104:703-708
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2021.
-
Abstract
- Background Clinical guidelines informed by patient preferences are more likely to be used and widely advocated, yet research shows that few guidelines reflect patient preferences. Objective Explore how developers generate guidelines informed by patient preferences. Patient Involvement Seventeen patients were involved as interview participants. Methods Using a basic descriptive approach, we conducted and analyzed semi-structured telephone interviews with 50 participants who were involved in developing guidelines on various topics. The sample included 17 patients, 16 clinicians and 17 managers from a total of 7 countries. Results Participants used one or more approaches to identify preferences, patient panelists, focus groups, surveys and review of published research, despite acknowledging they identified similar preferences. Participants said they incorporated preferences in all guideline development steps, but provided little detail of specific processes. Few participants said their guidelines explicitly reported how patients were engaged, preferences identified, or how preferences influenced development processes or the guideline. Enablers were patient and clinician training, supportive coordinators and chairs, involving experienced patients, and assistance from qualitative and review experts. Barriers were finding and preparing patients, clinician skepticism about benefits, and token patient involvement. Participants recommended research on how to generate preference-informed guidelines. Discussion Ideal approaches to identify, incorporate and report patient preferences in guidelines are unclear and unproven. Practical Value Findings revealed specific ways that developers can enhance their processes (e.g. patient training, supportive coordinators and chairs, involve experts in qualitative researcher and systematic reviews) and key issues that warrant ongoing research (e.g. how best to incorporate and report preferences).
- Subjects :
- Medical education
030503 health policy & services
Qualitative interviews
Patient Preference
Sample (statistics)
General Medicine
Guideline
Focus Groups
Patient preference
Focus group
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Systematic review
Surveys and Questionnaires
Humans
030212 general & internal medicine
Patient Participation
Descriptive research
0305 other medical science
Psychology
Qualitative research
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 07383991
- Volume :
- 104
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Patient Education and Counseling
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....d2ed09e5976b7540fbd6d6693ee89bc2