Back to Search Start Over

Pathogens distribution and antimicrobial resistance in bloodstream infections in twenty-five neonatal intensive care units in China, 2017–2019

Authors :
Cheng-yuan Zhang
Shaofeng Wang
Haiying He
Min Geng
Jing Liu
Jing Li
Zengyu Fang
Rongrong Sun
Hongli Geng
Xiao-kang Wang
Li-ping Deng
Ren-xia Zhu
Meiying Han
Qiang Liu
Xinjian Liu
Guoying Zhao
Zhijie Liu
Baoying Wang
Yanjie Ding
Xueming Sun
Xuexue Xing
Delong Fu
Weibing Chen
Yan-ling Gao
Yong-hui Yu
Huang Lei
Fudong Peng
Source :
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
BioMed Central, 2021.

Abstract

Background Overcrowding, abuse of antibiotics and increasing antimicrobial resistance negatively affect neonatal survival rates in developing countries. We aimed to define pathogens and their antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of early-onset sepsis (EOS), hospital-acquired late-onset sepsis (HALOS) and community-acquired late-onset sepsis (CALOS) in 25 neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in China. Study design This retrospective descriptive study included pathogens and their AMR from all neonates with bloodstream infections (BSIs) admitted to 25 tertiary hospitals in China from January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019. We defined EOS as the occurrence of BSI at or before 72 h of life and late-onset sepsis (LOS) if BSI occurred after 72 h of life. LOS were classified as CALOS if occurrence of BSI was ≤ 48 h after admission, and HALOS, if occurrence was > 48 h after admission. Results We identified 1092 pathogens of BSIs in 1088 infants from 25 NICUs. Thirty-two percent of all pathogens were responsible for EOS, 64.3% HALOS, and 3.7% CALOS. Gram-negative (GN) bacteria accounted for a majority of pathogens in EOS (56.7%) and HALOS (62.2%). The most frequent pathogens causing EOS were Escherichia coli (27.2%) and group B streptococcus (GBS; 14.6%) whereas in CALOS they were GBS (46.3%) and Staphylococcus aureus (41.5%). Klebsiella pneumoniae (27.9%), Escherichia coli (15.7%) and Fungi (12.8%) were the top three isolates in HALOS. Third-generation cephalosporin resistance rates in GN bacteria ranged from 9.7 to 55.6% in EOS and 26% to 63.3% in HALOS. Carbapenem resistance rates in GN bacteria ranged from 2.7 to 31.3% in HALOS and only six isolates in EOS were carbapenem resistant. High rates of multidrug resistance were observed in Klebsiella pneumoniae (60.7%) in HALOS and in Escherichia coli (44.4%) in EOS. All gram-positive bacteria were susceptible to vancomycin except for three Enterococcus faecalis in HALOS. All-cause mortality was higher among neonates with EOS than HALOS (7.4% VS 4.4%, [OR] 0.577, 95% CI 0.337–0.989; P = 0.045). Conclusions Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and GBS were the leading pathogens in EOS, HALOS and CALOS, respectively. The high proportion of pathogens and high degree of antimicrobial resistance in HALOS underscore understanding of the pathogenesis and emphasise the need to devise effective interventions in developing countries.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20472994
Volume :
10
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d2d3564a8aa6b6f15997ab045d3cd506